Search for: "Royal v. Secretary of Health & Human Services" Results 21 - 35 of 35
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2014, 7:03 am by Bryan Heaney
Interveners: The Royal College of Midwives and the British Pregnancy Advisory Service The Supreme Court has allowed interventions by the Royal College of Midwives and the British Pregnancy Advisory Service. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am by INFORRM
A freelance reporter and photographer had been sent by the newspaper to cover the service. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am by INFORRM
Neil Turner v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 12/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Daily Mirror, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Metro, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Bath & North East Somerset Council v The Times, Clause 5, 11/04/2013; Warren Hamilton Daily Mai, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Catherine Whiteside The Scottish Sun, Clauses 1, 5, 11/04/2013; Ms Lynne Hales v Daily Mail, Clause 6, 11/04/2013; Emilie Sandy v The Citizen (Gloucester) v… [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
This week’s resolved cases include: Dolan-Powers v The Observer, Clause 1, 14/12/2012 Weston Area Health NHS Trust v Weston, Worle & Somerset Mercury, Clause 1, 10/12/2012 Lord Hunt, chair of the PCC, has appointed Lord Chris Smith (former Labour culture secretary), Simon Jenkins (former editor of the Times) and Lord Phillips (former president of the supreme court) as unpaid special advisers to help set up a new press regulator. [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:02 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
De Almeida, R (on the application of) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea [2012] EWHC 1082 (Admin) – Read judgment This was a judicial review of RBK&C’s refusal to provide support under s.21 and s.29 National Assistance Act 1948 and indeed to carry out an assessment under s.47 of the National Health Service and Community Care Act 1990. [read post]
12 May 2012, 5:15 am by NL
De Almeida, R (on the application of) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea [2012] EWHC 1082 (Admin) This was a judicial review of RBK&C's refusal to provide support under s.21 and s.29 National Assistance Act 1948 and indeed to carry out an assessment under s.47 of the National Health Service and Community Care Act 1990. [read post]
12 May 2012, 5:15 am by NL
De Almeida, R (on the application of) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea [2012] EWHC 1082 (Admin) This was a judicial review of RBK&C's refusal to provide support under s.21 and s.29 National Assistance Act 1948 and indeed to carry out an assessment under s.47 of the National Health Service and Community Care Act 1990. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:20 am by INFORRM
Dan Wootton, former showbiz editor at the News of the World, told Lord Justice Leveson he believes all celebrities have a right to privacy, especially in areas of sexuality, health, pregnancy and family. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 1:47 pm by Graeme Hall
Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust v Joint Committee of Primary Care Trusts &…. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 9:44 am by Blog Editorial
Human Genome Sciences Inc v Eli Lilly and Company, heard 18 – 20 July 2011. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:50 am by Matthew Flinn
Second, and giving all appropriate weight to what was said in R (C (A Minor)) v Secretary of State for Justice [2008] EWCA Civ 882, [2009] QB 657, and E v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary and another (Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission and others intervening) [2008] UKHL 66, [2009] 1 AC 536, the circumstan [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 9:59 pm by Adam Wagner
The Royal College of Nursing & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2010] EWHC 2761 (Admin) (10 November 2010) – Read judgment The High Court has ruled that a scheme which prohibits people convicted or cautioned for certain crimes from working with children or vulnerable adults breaches human rights law. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
For more detail you could do little better than head over to A royale quarterpounder, our post on Kay v UK, and you may also want to consider Nic Madge's take, not least as I've borrowed the inspiration for this subheading from him. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
For more detail you could do little better than head over to A royale quarterpounder, our post on Kay v UK, and you may also want to consider Nic Madge's take, not least as I've borrowed the inspiration for this subheading from him. [read post]