Search for: "Saul Cornell"
Results 21 - 40
of 186
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm
Historical Realities in the Second Amendment Debate, by Saul Cornell. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 4:25 am
” See Saul Cornell, A New Paradigm for the Second Amendment , 22 LAW & HIST. [read post]
3 May 2023, 3:58 am
” See Saul Cornell, A New Paradigm for the Second Amendment , 22 LAW & HIST. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 8:04 pm
First was the declaration of Saul Cornell, who argued that persons under the age of majority had "no unfettered right" to bear arms because Yale in 1800 and two other colleges prohibited students from possessing firearms. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 10:50 am
California's star witness was Saul Cornell, who testified that in his opinion, California's law fully complied with the Bruen decision. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
The only obscure source cited by the Bruen majority was an 1853 case from the Worcester County Court, in Massachusetts, which was originally cited in a law journal article by history professor Saul Cornell, and which is cited in the journal as being "on file with author. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
Saule T. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
But, as Saul Cornell and Gerry Leonard have recently argued, America prior to the War never escaped the overall description of a “herrenvolk democracy. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
" He quotes Saul Cornell describing "law office history" as "a results oriented methodology in which evidence is selectively gathered and interpreted to produce a preordained conclusion. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 11:17 am
" And he quotes Saul Cornell, writing in Slate, accusing the Court in Bruen of having "cherry picked" the historical record. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
" And he quotes Saul Cornell, writing in Slate, accusing the Court in Bruen of having "cherry picked" the historical record. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 7:43 am
The answer, given today's strong culture of judicial supremacy, is simply no.The guests on my last two Supreme Myths podcasts were Saul Cornell, history professor at Fordham, and Jud Campbell, law professor at the University of Richmond (visiting this semester at the University of Chicago). [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 9:30 pm
Saul Cornell, Fordham Law, has a substantial post, Originalism's Historical Problems: The Supreme Court's Embrace of a Controversial Theory, over at Origins: Current Events in Historical Perspective. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 9:30 pm
” Noting that Fordham Law professor Saul Cornell had called the Court’s history in Bruen “cherry-picked” and “an ideological fantasy,” Judge Reeves observed:This Court is not a trained historian. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 4:51 am
” Saul Cornell, Cherry‐picked history and ideology‐driven outcomes: Bruen’s originalist distortions, ScotusBlog (June 27, 2022). [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 10:23 am
Saul Cornell makes it up Fordham history professor Saul Cornell writes for Slate magazine. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:30 pm
”ICYMI on Bruen and Dobbs: Saul Cornell on Cherry-picked history and ideology-driven outcomes in Bruen (SCOTUSblog). [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 2:05 pm
Saul Cornell is the Paul and Diane Guenther chair in American history at Fordham University and adjunct professor of law at Fordham Law School. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
Contributions include The Long Arc of Arms Regulation in Public: From Surety to Permitting, 1328–1928, by Saul Cornell, Fordham University:This Article charts the six-century arc of arms regulation in public in the Anglo-American legal tradition. [read post]
20 May 2022, 6:42 pm
And online at Slate, professor Saul Cornell has a jurisprudence essay titled “The Horror in New York Shows the Madness of the Supreme Court’s Looming Gun Decision. [read post]
