Search for: "Schmitt v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 123
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2019, 1:45 am
Global Britain and the future character of conflict Bettina Renz, Russian responses to the changing character of war Harsh V. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Proia, Freeing the Prop 8 Tape: Perry v. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 11:41 am
Carl Schmitt Scott Sheeran, Human rights and derogation in peacekeeping: addressing a legal vacuum within the state of exception Diane A. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
United States, ex rel. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 5:37 am by Quinta Jurecic
The idea of a state of emergency evokes Schmitt in part because it suggests unilateral presidential power—the president as Schmitt’s sovereign, acting without restraint or guidance from the other branches of government. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
Amy Howe analyzes yesterday’s argument in United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 5:47 am by Trevor Covey
In Berry v Schmitt, the Sixth Circuit held that the Kentucky Bar Association (“KBA”) could not use Kentucky Rule of Professional Conduct 8.2(a) to bar an attorney, John Berry, from commenting on the Kentucky Legislative Ethics Commission investigation of Senate President David Williams.  [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
Tyler Schmitt and Grace Brosofsky preview the case for Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
LawSusan Bibler Coutin, Justin Richland, and Véronique FortinRepetition in History: Anglo-American Legal Debates and the Writings of Walter BagehotKunal M. [read post]
5 May 2014, 12:12 pm by Guest Blogger
This issue could have been solved by viewing Brown v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 11:54 am
How do states’ negotiation alternatives influence the concessions they receive in multilateral negotiations? [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 3:59 pm
Indeed, the attorney who signed the document merely indicates that he "states as follows," which is insufficient under the law (see Puntino v Chin, 288 AD2d 202 [2001]; Jones v Schmitt, 7 Misc 3d 47 [App Term, 2d & 11th Jud Dists 2005]; see also A.B. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 3:38 am by Edith Roberts
Lauren Devendorf and Tyler Schmitt preview the case for Cornell. [read post]