Search for: "Sellers v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 3,681
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2018, 11:38 am
United States v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 9:05 pm
As stated in Blue Chip Stamps: “A private damages action under Rule 10b-5 is confined to actual purchasers or sellers of securities. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:30 am
See Mateer v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 1:01 pm
Many states have legislation on the books that insulates non-manufacturing intermediate sellers from strict liability. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 7:34 am
DeProspo The Massachusetts Appeals Court in Host v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 10:56 pm
The agreement stated further that neither the auctioneer nor the seller purported to be experts about defects of the immovable property and therefore their failure to specifically point out a specific defect could not be seen as any form of misrepresentation. [read post]
18 May 2020, 4:28 am
” In Heaton v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 3:25 pm
Stores Co. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 1:54 pm
Bills being considered by both houses of the United States Congress may change that for certain remote sellers. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 3:05 pm
In South Dakota v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 2:59 pm
As explained by the Florida Supreme Court in Johnson v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am
Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 7:00 am
Most states have modeled their law after the South Dakota law analyzed in South Dakota v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 3:24 pm
A group of book sellers and publishers filed a federal lawsuit Tuesday against Texas officials to block House Bill (HB) 900, the state’s new book ratings law. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 1:13 pm
Supreme Court's opinion in Credit Suisse Securities (USA) v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:19 pm
First, an activist short-seller’s work product is an unreliable source of new information about an issuer because the short-seller has an economic interest in driving down the stock price. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 2:47 pm
In South Dakota v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 2:09 pm
Cardone and Cardone Capital qualified as “sellers” under the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Pinter v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:01 am
Wayfair, upheld South Dakota's sales tax on out-of-state sellers against a Commerce Clause (or, more precisely, Dormant Commerce Clause) challenge. [read post]
