Search for: "Seth Barrett Tillman, Josh Blackman" Results 21 - 40 of 43
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2017, 9:09 am by Glenn Reynolds
The DOJ isn’t looking so great either: “The president’s most effective defender on the subject of foreign emoluments is not his own Justice Department but a pair of law professors: Seth Barrett Tillman, a law professor at Maynooth University in Ireland, and Josh Blackman, a professor at the South Texas College of Law. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 7:46 am by Joe Hodnicki
Here’s the abstract for Seth Barrett Tillman & Josh Blackman, Is Robert Mueller an “Officer of the United States” or an “Employee of the United States”? [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 3:05 am by Walter Olson
Harris, Bloomberg, Washington Post; two views at Volokh Conspiracy from David Post and Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman; earlier on Emoluments Clause litigation] Last year I noted the hotel-competitor fact pattern as the kind of emoluments case most likely to clear the standing hurdle; Excessive fines are unconstitutional, whether levied on persons or on groups of persons [Ilya Shapiro and Matthew Larosiere and Dave Kopel on Cato/Independence… [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
"ICYMI: Josh Blackman & Seth Barrett Tillman on Lawfare: Is Robert Mueller an “Officer of the United States” or an “Employee of the United States”? [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 8:01 pm by NCC Staff
Trump lawsuits on behalf of another legal scholar, Seth Barrett Tillman. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Additional details and application instructions.ICYMI: Annette Gordon Reed's writing routines; Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman, Yes, Trump Can Accept Gifts, New York Times, July 13, 2017. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 2:20 pm by NCC Staff
Trump lawsuit on behalf of another law professor, Seth Barrett Tillman. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 4:30 am by Josh Blackman
[CRS has relied on Tillman’s Scholarship about who holds an “Office . . . under” the United States] [This post is co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman] The Foreign Emoluments Clause provides that "no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them [the United States], shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 4:57 am by SHG
Somebody owes somebody an apology here, but if I was Josh Blackman or Seth Tillman, I wouldn’t hold my breath. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:15 am by Josh Blackman
So I would ask unanimous consent that we enter into the record the statement from Professor Josh Blackman and lecturer Seth Tillman detailing the exchange with Miss Ochoa's office. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 7:04 am by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman
” The other one (Blackman) was persuaded by this research some years ago, long before the notion of a President Trump was even conceivable. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 12:10 pm by Victoria Clark
Seth Barrett Tillman and Josh Blackman questioned whether special counsel Robert Mueller is an “officer” or “employee” of the United States. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 12:17 pm by Josh Blackman
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman, have passed along this response to the recent decision in the Emoluments Clause litigation against President Trump; naturally, I'd be delighted to post a response in turn from their adversaries. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 11:40 am by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman
Days after President Trump’s inauguration in January 2017, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) brought suit against the president under the foreign emoluments clause. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 4:53 am by Victoria Clark
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman questioned whether Mueller is an “Officer” of the United States or an “Employee” of the United States in light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Lucia v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 5:14 am by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman
(Matt McClain/ The Washington Post) Our first, second and third posts, based on briefs we submitted to the District Courts for the Southern District of New York and the District of Columbia, explained that because the president does not hold an “Office . . . under the United States,” he or she is not subject to the foreign emoluments clause. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 2:38 am by Lana Ulrich
The Interactive Constitution also features explanations of the Foreign Emoluments Clause of Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 by Seth Barrett Tillman and Zephyr Teachout. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:00 am by Nicandro Iannacci
Seth Barrett Tillman, law lecturer at Maynooth University, adds that Congress also has power at stake in the debate—specifically, its power “to inform itself and to maintain exclusive control over access to its physical facilities. [read post]