Search for: "Shields v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner"
Results 21 - 33
of 33
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 4:24 am
Data Protection Commissioner. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 4:24 am
Data Protection Commissioner. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 4:14 pm
The most striking legal story of the week was the reporting of the Administrative Court’s ruling on Article 50 and the Royal Prerogative ([2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin)). [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 8:16 pm
He argues this, despite the fact that Hammond did not create her own first-party SNT to potentially shield her income from such a benefit determination. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
Commissioner, 74 Mass. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
Commissioner, 74 Mass. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 6:37 am
Because Wayne had been working in and out of his family's franchise business since he was 13, he qualified for Social Security survivor benefits even at his young age. [read post]
22 May 2012, 5:38 am
The Victorian privacy commissioner argued that existing privacy laws are fragmented and inadequate to meet the privacy challenges faced by technological developments. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
The Commissioner of the Social Security Administration subsequently appealed the district court's decision, arguing that the ALJ permissibly discounted appellee's testimony and that the district court substituted its own judgment for that of the ALJ in concluding otherwise. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
The Commissioner of the Social Security Administration subsequently appealed the district court's decision, arguing that the ALJ permissibly discounted appellee's testimony and that the district court substituted its own judgment for that of the ALJ in concluding otherwise. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 6:23 pm
“Instead,” DeBofsky said, “courts conduct reviews of claim records assembled and shaped by self-serving insurance companies without hearing any testimony whatsoever, under a procedure that gives more deference to the insurance company than a court would give a Social Security administrative law judge in its review of a Social Security disability benefit claim denial. [read post]