Search for: "Sinclair v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 105
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
It was also submitted for judicial review to the Federal Court in Chrétien v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
  The political economy of international standard setting in financial reporting: how the United States led the adoption of IFRS across the world. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
Farrell argued that the EU is “likely to be become increasingly aggressive” against U.S. e-commerce companies, even though the United States shies away from large-scale antitrust investigations. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
United States Summer Zervos’ defamation claim [read post]
13 May 2018, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
United States Hawaii News Now notes the Hawaii Supreme Court’s overturn of a dismissal in a defamation lawsuit against Hawaii County, a former councilman and private investigator. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 7:24 pm by Schachtman
See “Non-publication of legal opinions in the United States. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 2:18 pm by Eugene Volokh and Geoffrey Stone
” Ten days later, Comstock, who over the decades had become the United States’ most feared moralist, died of pneumonia. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 10:00 pm by Tommy Tobin
The three judge DeCoster appeals panel issued a three-opinion ruling, with the majority advancing a concept of responsible corporate officer liability arising from the FDCA and the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 7:33 am by Christine Corcos
United States, 524 U.S. 125 (1998), which presented the question whether driving a car or truck with a firearm in the trunk or glove compartment amounted to “carrying” the firearm. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 7:33 am
United States, 524 U.S. 125 (1998), which presented the question whether driving a car or truck with a firearm in the trunk or glove compartment amounted to “carrying” the firearm. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 2:44 pm by Michael Grossman
” Delivering the majority decision in Voisine v United States, Justice Elena Kagan eloquently stated: “Reckless con­duct, which requires the conscious disregard of a known risk, is not an accident: It involves a deliberate decision to endanger another. [read post]