Search for: "Smith v. Ga. Power Co"
Results 21 - 40
of 123
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
She has authored and co-authored numerous books including the How to Understand Statutes and Regulations, Annotated Federal Interpretation Act, The Practical Guide to Canadian Legal Research, Introduction to the Law and Legal System of Canada, and Updating Statutes and Regulations for all Canadian Jurisdictions. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 8:38 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2018)Last year I taught a course on Corporate Social Responsibility Law for the very first time (Corporate Social Responsibility Law--A Tentative Syllabus). [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:40 pm
At one extreme, and still quite powerful, the law views the corporation as property in the hands of its equity owners. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm
CalPERS appealed, asserting that its individual suit was timely because the three-year time limit was subject to equitable tolling pursuant to American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 11:30 am
The Supreme Court decided in NAACP v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm
LON SMITH & ASSOCIATES, INC. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm
LON SMITH & ASSOCIATES, INC. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 5:37 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2016) Several months ago I posted a draft syllabus for a new course on Corporate Social Responsibility (Corporate Social Responsibility Law--A Tentative Syllabus). [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 1:26 pm
At one extreme, and still quite powerful, is the view of the corporation as property in the hands of its equity owners. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 11:35 am
Co., 481 S.E.2d 558 (Ga. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 12:12 am
[1] Cede & Co. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 10:47 am
Gas Pipeline Co. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 4:07 pm
The Guardian had an editorial entitled “Fake Sheikh: an abuse of power”. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 4:26 pm
In the following guest post, Christopher Smith of the Sydney office of the the Clyde & Co. law firm, take a look at an interesting recent case from an Australian Court, in which the court held that directors who sign corporate documents must be able to read and understand the documents in order to discharge their duties. [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:30 pm
This post is from the non-Reed Smith side of the blog. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 8:06 am
Given Kunes’s [First National Bank & Trust Co. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
We would like to thank Reed Smith’s Kevin Hara for helping to put this together.Daimler AG v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
RUEDA, Appellant V. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 5:00 am
Smith & Nephew, Inc., ___ F. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
See Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]