Search for: "State v. Burden"
Results 21 - 40
of 22,097
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2021, 4:00 am
If a state regulates the hours during which non-emergency abortions, including pre-viability abortions, can be performed (perhaps to allow state inspection during regular working hours), should the undue burden test apply? [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 6:48 am
Soule v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 7:49 am
One of the most important things that anyone charged with a Florida theft crime should know is that the burden is at all times on prosecutors to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you committed the crime. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 9:00 am
In Meacham v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:52 am
Georgia, 219 Ga. 345, 133 S.E. 2d 367 (Ga. 1963); State v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 11:27 am
See State v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 9:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 6:19 am
« Back to newsSubscribeThe post United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 6:07 am
State v. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 12:35 pm
Criminal procedure — Closing argument by state — Burden-shifting language A jury sitting in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City acquitted appellant Steven Johnson of first-degree murder, but convicted him of conspiracy to commit murder, second-degree murder, use of a handgun in the commission of a crime of violence, carrying a handgun, possession of a ... [read post]
24 May 2009, 9:10 am
State v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 3:44 pm
IDMWORKS, L.L.C. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 8:45 am
Again, assuming that the plaintiff or the State has the burden of proof, the defendant has none. [read post]
20 May 2011, 4:30 am
Serrano v. 180 Connect, Inc., 478 F.3d 1018 (9th Cir. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 1:48 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 4:43 am
Petitioner has the burden of proving that his or her probationary termination was made in bad faithNegron v Jackson, 273 AD2d 241The New York State Department of Motor Vehicles terminated Pedro Negron during his probationary period. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 3:11 am
Inc. v New York State Dept. of Audit & Control, 23 Misc 3d 923The U.S. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 8:30 am
Judge O'Malley explained that the majority of the Federal Circuit found the statute on this point to be ambiguous and, therefore, no deference was given to any interpretation of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) under Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 7:57 am
United States District Judge Steven V. [read post]
4 Jan 2009, 10:26 am
State v. [read post]
