Search for: "State v. Grooms" Results 21 - 40 of 438
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm by admin
  Selikoff married Celia Schiffrin in Manhattan.[23]  It was the second marriage for both bride and groom. 1947. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
If a state were to pass a law today saying that, say, its governor will decide which slate of electors will represent the state in the Electoral College every four years, that law would not violate the United States Constitution.Now, however, such laws have no prospect of being passed in enough states to guarantee a Republican win in 2024. [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 7:01 am by Farah Pandith, Jacob Ware
Shamima Begum, a notorious Islamic State female fighter who traveled to join the group in Syria at age 15, has for instance made frequent claims of self-defense, asserting that she was “groomed” into joining the Islamic State in 2015. [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 9:28 am by Nassiri Law
It also against both state and federal law for an employer to discriminate against a person in any aspect of employment on the basis of sex or gender. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 6:14 am by Naomi Shatz
As explained above, any sex-specific dress or grooming policy, like any other sex-based classification, must be substantially related to an important governmental objective. [read post]
18 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
That was the knock, of course, on the infamous (and thoroughly discredited) Bush v. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 9:00 am by Phil Dixon
There was therefore no error in the case. (1) Defendant’s challenge to the second step of the Batson analysis was preserved; (2) The State’s proffered explanations for its use of peremptory challenges were racially neutral; (3) The trial court did not clearly err in finding that the defendant failed to show purposeful discrimination under the totality of circumstances State v. [read post]