Search for: "State v. Harris" Results 21 - 40 of 5,164
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2025, 6:58 am by Dan Bressler
An actual conflict exists where an attorney has ‘divided and incompatible loyalties within the same matter necessarily preclusive of single-minded advocacy,’ whereas a potential conflict is one that may never be realized (People v Cortez, 22 NY3d 1061, 1068 [2014]). [read post]
31 Mar 2025, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
One state court held (by a 5–4 vote) that those statutes themselves violate the First Amendment when applied to newspaper reporters or editors.[7] But in AP v. [read post]
30 Mar 2025, 9:56 am by Thomas B. Griffith
United States, 272 U.S. 52 (1926), and concluding with Collins v. [read post]
29 Mar 2025, 2:25 pm by Mark Bennett
That’s Interesting Legal Issue #3: There’s a United States Supreme Court case called U.S. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2025, 9:30 pm by ernst
  A notice of Cheryl Harris’s Mathew O. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 7:16 pm by Robert Kuhn
  The amount stated in the good faith offer cannot be “less than the agency’s appraisal of just compensation. [read post]
23 Mar 2025, 9:30 pm by ernst
., Emory University School of Law, and Peter O'Neill, Stanford Law School, have posted The Forgotten Face of "Our Federalism,” which is forthcoming in the Yale Law Journal:Younger v. [read post]
21 Mar 2025, 9:47 am by Guest Author
These decisions include Wong Kim Ark, affirming birthright citizenship for all born in the United States and holding that Elk v. [read post]
19 Mar 2025, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
After all, the core idea underlying the modern First Amendment is that the government may not as Justice Jackson put it in West Virginia v. [read post]
In granting the stay, the Fourth Circuit found that the government satisfied the four factors governing stays under Nken v. [read post]
15 Mar 2025, 12:00 pm by Ram Eachambadi | JURIST Staff
Consequently, Harris stated that this is “a difficult case that will benefit from more sustained attention than we can give it in the present posture. [read post]