Search for: "State v. Holman" Results 21 - 40 of 139
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
In a recent decision of the Court of Protection, Re SB (A patient; capacity to consent to termination) [2013] EWHC 1417 (COP) 21 May 2013, Mr Justice Holman held that it had not been established that a woman, SB, undergoing treatment for bipolar disorder lacked capacity to make decisions about her desire to terminate her pregnancy and stated that he would either make a declaration to that effect or dismiss the proceedings. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:43 am by familoo
Meanwhile, further down the judicial corridor, Holman J took a different view. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 1:14 am by Emma Kent
Back in 2000 in the House of Lords case White v White, Lord Thorpe stated that the calculation is ‘a tool not a rule’. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:51 am
In this study, we examine the impact of the gender discrimination lawsuit Pao v. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 3:36 am by Edith Roberts
At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps looks at the story behind a state constitutional provision relied on by Montana in Espinoza v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:44 am by Lisa Ouellette
(This is copyright, not patent, so I'll note it again tomorrow, but the rest of the panel is more patent-focused.)Lucas Osborn – 3D printing raises IP issues.Randy Picker – Reviews computer competition and innovation over last 100 years, including how WWII government contracting decisions shaped the computer patent environment.Michael Risch – 19th century apple-parer patents are instructive, including in showing how patent enforcement can channel innovation… [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 4:06 am
  Importantly, Professors Rebecca Eisenberg and Christopher Holman state that a possible explanation for this distinction by the U.S. [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 2:36 pm by familoo
See A and B v Rotherham MBC [2014] EWFC 47 Fam. [read post]