Search for: "State v. Holman"
Results 21 - 40
of 139
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am
In a recent decision of the Court of Protection, Re SB (A patient; capacity to consent to termination) [2013] EWHC 1417 (COP) 21 May 2013, Mr Justice Holman held that it had not been established that a woman, SB, undergoing treatment for bipolar disorder lacked capacity to make decisions about her desire to terminate her pregnancy and stated that he would either make a declaration to that effect or dismiss the proceedings. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:43 am
Meanwhile, further down the judicial corridor, Holman J took a different view. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 1:14 am
Back in 2000 in the House of Lords case White v White, Lord Thorpe stated that the calculation is ‘a tool not a rule’. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 12:58 pm
By Chris Holman Roche Diagnostics Corp. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:51 am
In this study, we examine the impact of the gender discrimination lawsuit Pao v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 8:11 am
Court of Appeals, in Jacobson Holman PLLC v. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 3:36 am
At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps looks at the story behind a state constitutional provision relied on by Montana in Espinoza v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 12:48 pm
United States, 211 F.3d 280, 284 (5th Cir. 2000); Holman v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 10:30 am
Gomez v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:44 am
(This is copyright, not patent, so I'll note it again tomorrow, but the rest of the panel is more patent-focused.)Lucas Osborn – 3D printing raises IP issues.Randy Picker – Reviews computer competition and innovation over last 100 years, including how WWII government contracting decisions shaped the computer patent environment.Michael Risch – 19th century apple-parer patents are instructive, including in showing how patent enforcement can channel innovation… [read post]
17 May 2017, 10:06 am
Warden, Holman Corr. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 6:07 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 2:51 pm
This is the same protocol that was at issue in Glossip v. [read post]
13 May 2016, 8:00 am
John Stuckey, as Attorney-in-Fact for Robert Holman v. [read post]
13 May 2016, 8:00 am
John Stuckey, as Attorney-in-Fact for Robert Holman v. [read post]
13 May 2016, 8:00 am
John Stuckey, as Attorney-in-Fact for Robert Holman v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 4:06 am
Importantly, Professors Rebecca Eisenberg and Christopher Holman state that a possible explanation for this distinction by the U.S. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 12:10 pm
Jacobson Holman, PLLC, (E.D. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 12:10 pm
Jacobson Holman, PLLC, (E.D. [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 2:36 pm
See A and B v Rotherham MBC [2014] EWFC 47 Fam. [read post]