Search for: "State v. Weeks"
Results 21 - 40
of 41,692
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2024, 10:10 am
The order in Sandoval v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:50 am
Thus, in Auerbach v Bennett (47 NY2d 619 [1979]), New York’s highest court held that courts have the power in shareholder derivative litigation to grant unnamed interested shareholders leave to intervene – even for the first time on appeal. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am
Last week in the courts On Tuesday 7 and Wednesday 8 May 2024, there was a final hearing in the case of MBR Acres v Persons Unknown QB-2021-003094. [read post]
12 May 2024, 7:37 am
Carpin v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 3:51 am
It appears that divisions may also be discussing their approaches amongst each other given that they cite each other’s decisions that are issued in the same week or even on the same day. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 5:10 am
In Pliva, Inc. v Mensing (564 U.S. 604 [2011]), the Supreme Court found that these plaintiffs’ state-law claims against generic manufacturers were preempted by federal law under the Supremacy Clause to the extent that state-law failure-to-warn statutes required generic drugs to provide more stringent, safer warning labels. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:45 am
The case is Jamie Allen Harless v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 6:05 am
” At its core, Weinstein’s case simply applied the long-established rules of the more than century-old case of People v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 4:25 am
Beavers v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 4:10 am
Suit was filed last week in an Indiana state trial court by an anti-abortion organization objecting to the state Health Department's new policy of releasing only aggregate data from Termination of Pregnancy Reports filed by abortion providers. [read post]
8 May 2024, 3:52 pm
” UC President Michael V. [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:28 pm
United States (Treaty Rights; "Bad Men" Provision) Reges v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:53 am
That lawfare got underway this week when TikTok filed a substantial lawsuit (by the pound) to stop the sale and protect access to the US market, just a little while longer. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:26 am
In comparison, Daniels may be the only authentic part of the entire case in New York v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:10 am
The complaint (full text) in People of the State of New York v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 12:30 pm
Bissonnette v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:32 am
” The claimant was paid LWA for weeks 31, 33, 34, and 36 of 2020 in the amount of $1,200.00 [$300 each week], for which the claimant was not eligible and to which the claimant was not entitled, and that the payment of such benefits was due to. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:42 am
Bell v. [read post]
