Search for: "State Farm v. INSURANCE DEPT."
Results 21 - 40
of 150
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2010, 8:10 am
UM – STOLEN VEHICLE – EVIDENCE NEEDED TO OVERCOME PRESUMPTION OF PERMISSIVE USE – FRAMED-ISSUE HEARING State Farm Mut. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 7:15 am
Imaging, P.C. a/a/o Staffa Pasqualino v State Farm Mut. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 9:24 pm
Co. of N.Y., 8 AD3d 310 [plaintiff stated General Business Law § 349 cause of action by alleging that the defendant engaged in deceptive practices by increasing the cost of insurance rates without regard to certain flexible factors which would have required the raise to decrease]; Skibinsky v State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 10:36 am
Respondent made a claim for uninsured motorists (UM) coverage benefits to State Farm, her mother's personal auto insurer. [read post]
6 Jul 2008, 9:58 pm
Co. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 12:09 am
State Farm Mut. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 8:35 am
Rahmanov (1st Dept., decided 11/18/2008) Rahmanov was injured in an auto accident with a car registered to McKain, driven by McDaniels and insured by State Farm. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 6:50 am
Co., 17 AD3d 444; Vacca v State Farm Ins. [read post]
12 May 2008, 6:06 pm
Co. v Bettenhauser, 95 NY2d 185, 188; State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 8:58 am
State Farm Ins. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 4:59 am
Co., 17 AD3d 444; Vacca v State Farm Ins. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 5:18 am
" State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 3:30 am
State Farm Ins. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 12:26 pm
Co. of North Carolina State Farm Mut. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 6:56 pm
Co. (4th Dept., decided 3/27/2009) The owners of RB Woodcraft, Inc., insured their home with State Farm. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 8:50 am
Rienzo(2nd Dept., decided 9/2/2008)In Matter of State Farm Ins. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 3:44 pm
Co. v Escobar, 61 AD3d 869; Matter of State Farm Ins. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 7:33 am
State Farm denied all coverages based, among other grounds, that Spicehandler's injuries and death were caused by Popadich's intentional criminal conduct and thus were not the result of an "accident" as required by the State Farm policy.On State Farm's motion to renew its summary judgment motion following Popadich's criminal conviction, Nassau Supreme agreed with State Farm, declaring that it was… [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 7:35 am
Co. v State Farm Mut. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 6:14 am
Eckerd Corporation, 303 AD2d 998 (4th Dept, 2003); Cobb v. [read post]