Search for: "State v. Hinojosa"
Results 21 - 40
of 57
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2014, 6:52 am
In Ford v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 9:01 am
IANAL, but my personal view was that SB 187 did not provide enough discretion on sentencing to comply with the Supreme Court's decision in Miller v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 5:00 pm
Moore v. [read post]
16 Feb 2008, 8:45 am
The court of appeals decision is Gonzalez v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:02 am
Since Texas' legislation to require law enforcement to seek warrants for cell-phone location data failed to pass in 2013 (despite stalwart efforts from state Senators Juan Hinojosa and Craig Estes and state Rep. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 11:37 am
See Rider 73, Title V. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 2:35 pm
In relevant part, the fee agreement's arbitration clause states: XVII. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 8:11 am
Hinojosa, 2015 WL 10376624 (C.D. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:04 am
Hinojosa, 2015 WL 10376624 (C.D. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 8:27 am
Conference Activity 14:00-15:15 Opening remarks - Luis Hinojosa (Granada), Michael Karayanni (Hebrew), Yuval Shany (Hebrew) Keynote Speaker – Basak Cali (Koc/Berlin) 15:30-17:00 Panel I – International Adjudication in Times of Backlash Chair – Luis Hinojosa (Granada) Henry Lovat (Glasgow) - International Tribunal Backlash: A Pluralist Approach Johannes Hendrik Fahner (Luxembourg) - International Judicial Deference as Response to Backlash … [read post]
5 May 2010, 2:19 pm
” (State Farm Mut. [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 3:05 am
HINOJOSA: Yes, Your Honor. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:07 am
With SB 783, State Sen. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 6:01 am
Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 11:00 pm
Kernan v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 10:19 pm
Grey v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 6:57 pm
But the substance of the order is the appointment of Gilberto Hinojosa as arbitrator. [read post]
21 Jul 2013, 8:17 am
Hughes and Senators Hinojosa and Estes' legislation this spring - if that had become law I'd have shut up about it about it by now! [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 8:46 pm
The Texas Supreme Court wasn’t buying it and reversed the appellate court saying, “Plain and simple, Hinojosa overworked the case; his $100,000 award is fee gouging at its worst. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:21 am
Hinojosa 15-833Issue: (1) Whether the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act’s presumption that a state decision rejecting a claim is a ruling on the merits can be rebutted by looking through to an earlier state ruling which applied a procedural bar that, under state law, could not be the basis for the later decision; and (2) whether, if so, a change in state law reducing a prisoner’s ability to earn future good-time credits based on… [read post]
