Search for: "State v. Lu"
Results 21 - 40
of 221
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2023, 2:40 am
On 17 April 2023, the Washington State House concurred to the State Senate’s amendments to Washington State House Bill 1155, the My Health My Data Act. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 10:15 am
A decision from an appeals court in the case of the Institute of Amazonian Studies against the Brazilian State (IEA v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 6:31 am
Lu, and Anna M. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 6:31 am
Lu, and Anna M. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 5:53 am
Here is the complaint: Lowery v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 12:53 pm
” Agency for Health Care Admin. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 7:44 am
Case date: 17 October 2022 Case number: No. 21-2350 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 2:48 am
Surveillance Privacy advocates are worried about the use of surveillance technology to track women seeking abortions in US states that have banned and restricted the procedure following the Supreme Court decision which overturned Roe v Wade. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:10 am
Lu Liang (‘Lu’, founder and chairman of Hunan Chayue) embarked upon another strategy: he directly challenged the very validity of the TM A in court and claimed that TM A was an irregular use of the idiom '察言观色'. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:59 am
” See Schaeffler v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 12:36 am
Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg) and C-559/20 (Koch Media GmbH v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 1:17 am
Recently, the decisions of courts in the United Kingdom (UK) in Unwired Planet v Huawei Technologies (Unwired Planet) and Optis Cellular Technology v Apple (which followed the decision of the UK Supreme Court in Unwired Planet) have given rise to significant debate over the appropriate forum for litigation of disputes in relation to standard essential patents (SEPs). [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 2:04 am
GuestKat Tian Lu discussed background of the case and provided a comment on the outcome of the decision and the assessment of deceptiveness of marks in light with the Trade Mark Law of China (TMLC) (see here).GuestKat Hayleigh Bosher reported on the case of the company Fizzy Foam, a trade mark owner that surrendered some of its registered marks, even though they were accepted by the UKIPO after receiving reactions on the Internet and a petition against their registrations… [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 8:26 am
., Ltd v The NOCO Company, a case on battery-powered car jump starters. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:56 am
Genentech v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 8:19 am
Case date: 20 April 2022 Case number: No. 18-916 Court: Supreme Court of the United States A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 6:52 pm
The wall of separation between Church and State (Everson v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 8:20 am
The law in this regard was summarised by Arnold J in Jarden Consumer Solutions (Europe) Ltd v SEB SA [2014] EWHC 445 (Pat) at [103]: “[103] As Kitchin LJ and Sir Robin Jacob said in their joint judgment in Gedeon Richter plc v Bayer Pharma AG[2012] EWCA Civ 235, [2013] Bus LR D17 at [61], ‘it is trite law that… the older (from the priority date of a patent under attack) a piece of prior art said to render a patent obvious, the harder it is to show… [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 7:46 am
., vacated its prior decision, and reversed the district court’s judgment that the claims of patent at issue were not invalid (Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 7:15 am
SG resisted the application to amend the patent, stating that it would not be ready to deal with the application. [read post]
