Search for: "State v. Martell"
Results 21 - 40
of 110
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2015, 12:33 pm
Zapien v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 9:05 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
Capital case Christeson earned its sixth relist this week; it asks (1) whether an actual conflict of interest meets the “interests of justice” standard established in Martel v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 7:08 am
Roper, 14-6873, a capital case apparently earning its fifth relist, asks (1) whether an actual conflict of interest meets the “interests of justice” standard established in Martel v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 2:00 pm
Roper, 14-6873 (fourth relist), is a capital case asking (1) whether an actual conflict of interest meets the “interests of justice” standard established in Martel v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am
Roper, 14-6873, a capital case that asks (1) whether an actual conflict of interest meets the “interests of justice” standard established in Martel v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
Roper, 14-6873, which asks (1) whether an actual conflict of interest meets the “interests of justice” standard established in Martel v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am
After relisting it once, the Court denied cert. in Martel v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:59 am
Meanwhile, Martel v Lujan, 14-132, involves a defendant who allegedly killed his estranged wife and an off-duty sheriff. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 1:30 pm
Martel v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 1:30 pm
Martel v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:15 pm
The petition of the day is: Martel v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 6:47 am
Supreme Court’s recent expansion of the Act’s reach in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 1:39 pm
Instead, the initial question on the merits is whether, notwithstanding the absence of any such legal duty, the state nevertheless imposes “substantial pressure on an adherent to modify his behavior and to violate his beliefs," Thomas v. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 2:58 am
Judge Moore’s rationale for the court of appeals in Michigan Catholic Conference v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 6:26 am
Hobby Lobby Part IV -- The myth of underinclusivenessHobby Lobby Part V -- Whose Religious Exercise? [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:52 am
(Indeed, there's no allegation that the Greens even are shareholders of the two companies, or that "their" funds would be indirectly used to make the reimbursement payments: Hobby Lobby and Martel are operated by trusts.) [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 11:51 am
Walker v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 11:56 am
Martel, D/B/A Martel Financial Group, and MFG FundingCase number: 12-cv-11095 (United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts)Case filed: June 19, 2012Qualifying judgment/order: January 7, 2013 02/08/2013 05/09/2013 2013-10 SEC v. [read post]