Search for: "State v. Poland"
Results 21 - 40
of 651
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2021, 1:36 am
Secretary of State Antony Blinken stated “this draft legislation threatens media freedom and could undermine Poland’s strong investment climate”. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 9:10 am
Under this state-by-state patchwork, the United States may develop an abortion regime that starts to look more like Europe’s. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 9:10 am
Under this state-by-state patchwork, the United States may develop an abortion regime that starts to look more like Europe’s. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 8:42 am
On April 27, the Supreme Court agreed to take up United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 4:03 am
Also of interest in this case is the court’s reference to Lord Sumption’s judgment in Zakrzewski v District Court in Torun, Poland [2013] UKSC 2, which stated that “as a general rule the court of the executing state is bound to take the statements and information in the warrant at face value. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 8:57 am
Poland, that effectively bars states under its jurisdiction from extraditing anyone to China. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 8:54 am
Maine Springs, LLC v. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 1:26 pm
The Commission tried to do something to reduce those emissions but in Case T-183/07 Poland v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 8:13 am
Madison is the Most Important Case decided by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 1:37 am
Vicoplus SC PUH v v Minister van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid; BAM Vermeer Contracting sp. zoo v Same; Olbek Industrial Services sp. zoo v Same (Case C-307/09 to C-309/09); [2011] WLR (D) 46 “Articles 56FEU and 57FEU of the FEU Treaty did not preclude a member state from making the hiring out on its territory of workers who were Polish nationals subject to the obtaining of a work permit during the transitional period provided for in paragraph 2… [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
Krolik and others v Polish Judicial Authorities: [2012] EWHC 2357 (Admin); [2012] WLR (D) 254 “In the light of the presumption that Poland, as a member state of the Council of Europe, was able and willing to fulfil its obligations under the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, in the absence of clear, cogent and compelling evidence to the contrary, a strict approach would in future be adopted in deciding appeals… [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 7:05 am
An open letter by security bigwigs from Poland, the Czech Republic, the Baltic states and other countries publicly bemoaned the decline in transatlantic relations. ... [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:59 am
Maine Springs, LLC v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 4:52 am
United States, 725 F.2d 1225, 1227-28 (9th Cir. 1984); United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 5:30 am
Jakobski v Poland (December 2010) – read judgment Mahayana Buddhists have profound moral objections to eating meat. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 4:00 am
Grzelak v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 8:04 am
In A. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 12:22 pm
See, for example:Why Airplanes Crash: Aviation Safety in a Changing World by Clinton V. [read post]
28 May 2012, 5:08 am
However, the judgment in Lukaszewski & Ors, R (Halligen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 20, handed down by the Supreme Court last week, appears to offer a ray of hope to applicants facing short time limits. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 1:30 pm
Poland, and al Nashiri v. [read post]
