Search for: "State v. Sheffield"
Results 21 - 40
of 122
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2008, 2:21 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Legal Services Commission v Rasool [2008] EWCA Civ 154 (05 March 2008) Revenue & Customs v Dunwood Travel Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 174 (07 March 2008) AIC Ltd v Marine Pilot Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 175 (07 March 2008) Research In Motion UK Ltd v Visto Corporation [2008] EWCA Civ 153 (06 March 2008) City Inn (Jersey) Ltd v Ten Trinity Square Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 156 (06 March 2008) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Bright,… [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 1:50 am
"There have been suggestions, following on from the Sheffield Case (Harvey v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 8:00 am
Bonness v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 8:06 am
” United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 5:43 pm
., Petitioners v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 9:58 pm
Roman Catholic Archbishop v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 3:48 am
In AAA -v- Rakoff [2019] EWHC 2525 (QB) Mr Justice Nicklin set out the importance of claimants (and their lawyers) setting out a clear and consistent basis for seeking anonymity in civil proceedings. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 7:58 am
Sheffield v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 3:50 am
The post Case Comment: R (Nunn) v Chief Constable of Suffolk Constabulary [2014] UKSC 37 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 1:35 am
The Lord Advocate states he will address alternatives. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 3:05 am
For instance, I worked very hard behind the scenes in State v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:57 pm
So, for example, Texas could seek bailout as a covered state …. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 4:02 pm
Sheffield v. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 5:59 am
At The University of Chicago Law School, Ginsburg stated on the 40th anniversary of Roe v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 3:09 am
” The Sheffield Court turned to the United States Supreme Court decisions in Daubert v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:53 am
The application was refused on two grounds: first, "it is not, in the state of English law now, arguable that the unqualified right to possession by a landlord is incompatible with Article 8; or indeed, in the light of Sheffield CC v Smart [2002] HLR 34, with Article 1 Protocol 1 of the Convention" (at [8]); second, the claim was not arguable on the facts of the case in which it appeared to the local authority that the property was vacant, and so could not be… [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:53 am
The application was refused on two grounds: first, "it is not, in the state of English law now, arguable that the unqualified right to possession by a landlord is incompatible with Article 8; or indeed, in the light of Sheffield CC v Smart [2002] HLR 34, with Article 1 Protocol 1 of the Convention" (at [8]); second, the claim was not arguable on the facts of the case in which it appeared to the local authority that the property was vacant, and so could not be… [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 8:00 am
Brauner v. [read post]
29 Oct 2024, 11:51 am
” Sheffield v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:08 am
Mark Janus, et al. v. [read post]
