Search for: "Succession of Feist"
Results 21 - 40
of 45
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2016, 8:56 am
See Feist, 499 U.S. at 363 (“[N]o one disputes that [the telephone company] undertook the task of alphabetizing the names itself. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 9:09 am
Feist: won’t find much in free to play, which is really about antipiracy/controlling entry. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:02 am
And racers to the bottom haven’t had much success in court. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 8:55 am
If you are successful and lucky enough to make your living from writing music then I agree that giving it away seems a step too far. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 12:45 am
How does this fit with the Feist case in which the US Supreme Court refused copyright protection to telephone directories? [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 8:55 am
If you are successful and lucky enough to make your living from writing music then I agree that giving it away seems a step too far. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 12:00 pm
He continued to ask such getting to know you questions in pretty rapid succession, about my family/interests/school, etc. [read post]
In Java case, Federal Circuit just declined to hold massive body of creative stuff non-copyrightable
10 May 2014, 12:23 am
But owning copyright in a text is different from owning every application of what the text teaches.In Feist v. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 7:38 am
Success of solutions depends on rethinking foundations. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:02 am
A lot of success of alternative healing comes from triggering through ritual of powerful placebo effects. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:40 am
A: the extremely successful GIs have this problem; contrast to the less successful ones that really want an appeal to terroir to provide sales appeal. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 7:36 am
Europe: Roles of vocal academics; less greedy rights owners; more respect to the creator; positive role of collecting societies; in the US, a measure for assessing copyright—promotion of progress—that doesn’t exist as a measure for copyright’s success in Europe; less clear how to balance rights with public interest, which is not constitutional. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 11:44 am
The second explanation, history, is that publishers and other distributors profit from copyright and therefore engage in extensive and successful interest group politics to ensure that the law favors them. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 11:00 am
[title fixed because I can't keep seasons straight]Suneal Bedi, Bad Brands: Experimental Studies in Trademark TarnishmentWhat is the reputation of a mark? [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 8:27 am
John Deere & Feist talk to us about the rationales—utilitarian even if not entirely incentive based—but Silbey is really interested in propertarian concepts of IP, not incentive/economic accounts; lots of economists are not propertarians.Many interviewees feel screwed by the system, but there are other examples of successful collaboration/openness—The Knockoff Economy. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 11:26 am
By Atreya Mathur and Beverly Osazuwa Dance has always been a significant part of human expression, and the expansion of the 1976 Copyright Act was the first U.S. law to make choreography copyrightable.[1] With the rise of MTV and music videos in the eighties, dance routines like those by Michael Peters (“Thriller”) and Anthony Thomas (“Rhythm Nation”) saw mass popularization. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 9:51 am
Most successful models: Wisconsin, MIT. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Folkens, a successful wildlife artist, but the courts failed to find protection for his illustration of two dolphins crossing each other underwater, with the appellate court upholding the trial judge's decision that a later adaptation did not infringe as the illustration was of a pose in a natural position and thus incapable of protection under copyright law, with the Ninth Circuit explaining that despite the similar positioning of the dolphins, a pose is not ordinarily… [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Introduction: Rebecca Tushnet What might we derive from things the Court has said about trademark of late? [read post]
