Search for: "Sullivan v. Sullivan" Results 21 - 40 of 4,098
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2024, 3:52 am by Frank Cranmer
The conviction of Rausing aside, however, since R v Hunter in 1974 there appear to have been nine fully-reported cases of the offence in England and Wales: R v Swindell (1981) 3 Cr App R (S) 255; R v Parry and McLean (1986) 8 Cr App R (S) 470; R v Skinner (Patrick and Ian) (1993) 14 Cr App R (S) 115; R v Godward [1998] 1 Cr App R (S) 385;  R v Lang (Jack Thomas) [2001] EWCA Crim 2690, [2002] 2 Cr App R… [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:37 am
Today's advance release tort law opinion: O'Sullivan v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 3:22 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“The plaintiff is required to plead actual, ascertainable damages that resulted from the attorneys’ negligence” (Bua v Purcell & Ingrao, P.C., 99 AD3d at 847; see Marinelli v Sullivan Papain Block McGrath & Cannavo, P.C., 205 AD3d at 716). [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 6:03 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The developers lose the case, not because the Village did not demonstrate anti-Jewish animus, but on more mundane procedural grounds.The case is BMG Monroe LLC v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Terry Hart
The hearing was presided over by Judge Carney, Judge Leval, and Judge Sullivan, who critically questioned both attorneys on their views. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
These include the following, among other indicators: (i) the acquirer is “well-capitalized” and the resulting institution will be “well-capitalized”; (ii) the acquirer has a Community Reinvestment Act (the “CRA”) rating of Outstanding or Satisfactory; (iii) the resulting institution will have total assets of less than $50 billion; (iv) the acquirer has composite, management and consumer compliance ratings of 1 or 2; and (v) the acquirer has… [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 1:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Property v. property: TM v. domain names; land v. chattels; IP v. consumer goods. [read post]