Search for: "Sweeney v. Sweeney" Results 21 - 40 of 433
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2022, 9:18 am by Florian Mueller
First, legislative measures like the DMA, regulatory intervention such as the ongoing DG COMP investigation of the Google Play Store, and litigation (in less than a week, the Ninth Circuit will hear Epic v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 8:25 am by Florian Mueller
That day is going to be (at least) doubly eventful from a FOSS Patents perspective as the Mannheim Regional Court will hold the first Ericsson v. [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 11:17 pm by Florian Mueller
Google has made billions of dollars from its equity position in Pokémon GO maker Niantic, yet collects even more from other companies' game revenues through the Google Play Store's app tax.One of the world's largest games companies, China's Tencent (which is also Epic's largest shareholder besides founder Tim Sweeney), has just doubled down on its efforts to circumvent the infamous app tax. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 10:29 pm by Florian Mueller
They don't make the decision, but both the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) presiding over the investigation and, ultimately, the Commission (the U.S. trade agency's top-level decision-making body) often find the staff's input useful.Discovery disputes between private parties are normal--and it's equally normal that companies being investigated or sued by antitrust enforcers dispute the scope of discovery requests (I've been watching that for a while now in United States… [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Lina M. Khan
Today [August 11], the Federal Trade Commission initiated a proceeding to examine whether we should implement new rules addressing data practices that are unfair or deceptive. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm by INFORRM
And, in Dunnes Stores v Ryan [2002] IEHC 61 (5 June 2002), Kearns J in the High Court struck down section 19(6) of the Companies Act, 1990 (also here), which required a company to provide an explanation or make a statement to an officer making inquiries about the company, on the grounds, inter alia, that it infringed the right to silence implied into Article 40.6.1(i) (a right now being relocated to Article 38.1 of the Constitution insofar as it relates to… [read post]