Search for: "The People v. Poe" Results 21 - 40 of 68
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2013, 7:40 am by Francisco MacĂ­as
I, personally, find Article V particularly interesting. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 10:06 am
District Judge Gordon Quist issued a narrow ruling determining that homeless people do not "reside" in emergency shelters if they only go there at night to sleep and have no guarantee of a place to stay on any given night. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 4:25 am
There the Court held that the fact that a search target was a newspaper could not be used to increase the level of Fourth Amendment protection it received.In my FindLaw piece, I say that the Supreme Court's one-right-at-a-time approach is inconsistent with the original understanding and with the approach canonically favored by Justice Harlan in his Poe v. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 9:05 pm by Jasmine Harris
” This concept may seem sufficiently broad to allow most plaintiffs’ lawyers recovery of fees, but it certainly does not have that valence after the Supreme Court’s decision in Buckhannon Board and Home Care v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 4:37 am by Michael C. Dorf
As I noted in that earlier essay, a leading opinion--Justice Harlan's dissent (only on jurisdictional grounds) in Poe v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 11:14 am by Eugene Volokh
My view is that people have a First Amendment right to speak anonymously online -- see, e.g., McIntyre v. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 7:58 am by Andres
Items of clothing might be granted copyright protection if they have reached the stage in which they can be considered art (see Poe v Missing Persons). [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 8:08 am
Problem 8 --James Madison, The Federalist No. 51 --Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist No. 84 --Thomas Jefferson to James Madison, December 20, 1787 --Brutus II [Antifederalist Paper No. 84] --Poe v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 1:45 pm
Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479, 484, 85 S.Ct. 1678, 1681, 14 L.Ed.2d 510 (1965); Poe v. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
            In the book, Professor Fleming carefully and methodically sets forth the structure and coherence of contemporary substantive due process doctrine, tracing it back to Justice Harlan’s dissent in Poe v. [read post]