Search for: "Thom v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 112
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2011, 8:23 am by Josh Wright
  If I may borrow from Thom’s description of the case: Brantley, et al. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 4:39 am
For interested readers, Marvel is much more generous to the FTC decision than co-blogger Thom who not to long ago posted a harsh (and in my view, fairly devastating on both legal and economic grounds) critique of the Commission’s approach. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: In 2020 the Australian High Court decided the case of Love v Commonwealth; Thoms v Commonwealth, a claim of constitutional belonging by two Aboriginal men. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 6:46 am by Kirk M. Hartung
(v) A process that is substantially economic, financial, business, social, cultural, or artistic. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 4:00 am by Jeff Welty
I culled these tidbits that I thought were interesting: Among the ten cases that Judge Gorsuch identified as the most significant of his judicial career is United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 4:00 am by Jeff Welty
I culled these tidbits that I thought were interesting: Among the ten cases that Judge Gorsuch identified as the most significant of his judicial career is United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
United States, 880 F.2d 84, 86-87 (8th Cir. 1989).Kansas: Savina v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 6:41 am by Karen Gullo
Moss is among a panel of patent experts testifying today before the Senate Subcommittee on Intellectual Property about the state of patent eligibility in America.The Supreme Court ruled in Alice v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 9:04 pm
Here’s the press release: TradeComet.com LLC filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, a complaint asserting Google violates antitrust laws by eliminating competition and choice. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 10:00 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) heard another appeal in the Cleveland Clinic v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:40 am
 On the principle of the matter, he stated at 111:In my judgment this reasoning [from Rohm & Haas] is persuasive, and it is supported by the subsequent judgment of the Court of Appeal in Virgin v Premium. [read post]