Search for: "Thompson, et al. v. CIR"
Results 21 - 40
of 49
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2013, 1:43 pm
Group, Inc., 639 F.3d 11, 17−18 (1st Cir. 2011)). [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 2:49 pm
Despite the efforts by Habasit to distort the teachings of Thompson, Jr. et al., the reference clearly teaches solving the identical problem, see col. 1, lines 26-34 of Thompson, Jr. et al. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:03 am
Thompson, et al., “Enhancing the ecological risk assessment process,” 4 Integrated Envt’l Assess. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 1:09 am
Cir. 2004), Dobbs v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 9:45 am
Thompson (2011), Board of County Commissioners of Bryan County v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
’’ Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
Microsoft et al.[25] In Motionless Keyboard, the inventor of a new keyboard showed his keyboard to investors, a friend, a business partner and a typist prior to filing an application. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 8:02 am
Google, Inc., 2011 WL 3100388 (2nd Cir. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
See, e.g., Igartúa, et al. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 12:57 pm
Ct. 2653 (2011), and Thompson v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:15 am
Cleary, et al., eds., McCormick on Evidence § 209, at 646 & n.1 (3d ed. 1984)( “In and of itself, statistical analysis can never prove that some factor A causes some outcome B. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 10:20 am
Bank of America, et al. and 2433 South Blvd. v Bank of America, et al. now pending in the Federal Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, and which were recently the subject of motions to dismiss. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
[et al.]. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:00 am
Harper, et al., The Law of Torts §§ 25.1, at 493 (2d ed. 1986)] (‘Harper’). [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 4:27 pm
"23 In Craven v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:05 pm
Michael Whitten, et al., 2010 U.S. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 12:00 pm
Danielle Thompson Williams and Leslie T. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 8:26 pm
In discussing how companies are using delaying tactics to stall hostile takeover bids (a subject for another day), Steven Davidoff opines: The trick is for courts to prevent this manipulation from depriving shareholders of the ultimate choice of when to sell the company. [read post]
18 May 2010, 3:50 am
City of New York Department of Corrections et al.,09-2634-cv UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT;010 U.S. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 9:16 pm
et al., No. 2010-1001 (Fed. [read post]
