Search for: "Thurmond v State" Results 21 - 40 of 52
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2012, 8:13 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
 Until recently, though, I was unaware of Ray v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:13 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
 Until recently, though, I was unaware of Ray v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:13 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
 Until recently, though, I was unaware of Ray v. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 8:00 pm by PRATER, DUNCAN & CRAIG 770-253-7778
Griffin, 238 GaApp 404, 406, 519 SE2d 22 (1999); Thurmond v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 2:52 pm by Bridget Crawford
EJS: How could Justice Thomas get confirmed after he said under oath that he had never discussed Roe v.  [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 6:04 am by Joshua Matz
Kent Scheidegger of Crime and Consequences argues that the Court’s denial of a stay of execution to Texas murderer Keith Thurmond bodes well for Arizona’s position in Martinez v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:16 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Under the terms of the Amendment, each state has a single vote, which is determined by how a majority of that state’s Representatives vote. [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 1:58 pm by Sandy Levinson
, where the answer is basically because over 200 years of systematic opposition to the idiocy of that system has proved unavailing against the barriers of Article V, most dramatically in 1969, where the Senate, because of a filibuster led by white supremacists Southern senators Sam Ervin and Strom Thurmond, never voted on a proposal that had in fact gained the assent of two-thirds of the House of Representatives and perhaps would have gotten the two thirds had the Senate been… [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  This is just the way the “state unit” system works, whatever the Supreme Court had suggested in Gray v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 2:07 am
Supreme Court has twice rejected this kind of argument (in the Allied Bruce v. [read post]