Search for: "U.S.P.T.O."
Results 21 - 40
of 40
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2010, 2:00 am
" Löwenbräu's allegations were based not just on "information and belief" but on an investigation, and it alleged that “Respondent knowingly made false, material misrepresentations of fact in procuring the Registrations with the intent to defraud the U.S.P.T.O. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 5:28 pm
of the software patents that Oracle asserted against Google have already been thrown out by the U.S.P.T.O. on reexaminations initiated by Google. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 6:00 am
We’ve written before about marijuana branding and how some may be trying to stake their claims with registrations that cover other goods that the U.S.P.T.O. may find similar or complementary to marijuana. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 10:31 am
My notes are messed up because I had technical difficulties! [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 4:06 pm
A cert petition is expected in March and the U.S.P.T.O. has put a moratorium on refusals of registrations of disparaging marks until the Supreme Court rules. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 9:22 am
On the other side of the pond [---aka the Atlantic for European cats] Apple applied to register the APP STORE mark with the U.S.P.T.O on July 17, 2008, which became the object of an opposition filed in 2010 by Microsoft Corporation. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 4:12 am
This Kat did a search on the database of the U.S.P.T.O and he found only four entries for the phrase. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 12:39 pm
If you have listed a person as an inventor improperly, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (U.S.P.T.O.) provides at least two mechanisms by which your error can be corrected. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
Commissioner Cohn announced that a cease and desist letter was sent last week by the Office of the Solicitor of the U.S.P.T.O. to the outfit calling itself “United States Trademark Registration Office. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 4:12 pm
Jones justifying Regeneron’s decision that disclosure of the withheld references to the U.S.P.T.O. was not required. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 5:53 am
Both the U.S.P.T.O. and the Trademark Board use the terminology “failure to function” when referring to a use of a designation in a non-trademark manner. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
For example the Court could request the views of the Solicitor General, the head of the U.S.P.T.O. or the Register of Copyrights. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 2:30 pm
[The need for such legislation presupposes that such conduct is not currently a violation of US laws] I further believe that the U.S.P.T.O. will strongly support such a legislative proposal, which is likely to have strong bipartisan support. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 8:34 am
Patent & Trademark Office (U.S.P.T.O.), a trademark is "a word, phrase, symbol, or design, or a combination thereof, that identifies and distinguishes the source of the goods of one party from those of others. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 5:37 pm
See U.S.P.T.O., Written Description Training Materials Revision 1 March 25, 2008 at 45-46. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 2:00 am
Michael Davitz, Partner at Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider and Practice Center Contributor, recently sent in this article he wrote with colleague’s Josephine Liu and Stacie Ropka discussing recent case law on the patentability of process claims. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 2:00 am
Michael Davitz, Partner at Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider and Practice Center Contributor, recently sent in this article he wrote with colleague’s Josephine Liu and Stacie Ropka discussing recent case law on the patentability of process claims. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 10:01 am
Moral Character (https://www.wikihow.com/Become-a-Patent-Lawyer#/Image:Become-a-Patent-Lawyer-Step-5-Version-5.jpg licensed via creative commons) First, before one can sit to take the U.S.P.T.O. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 1:05 pm
The U.S.P.T.O. rejected Bilski’s claims on the grounds that they were not a patentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 1:05 pm
The U.S.P.T.O. rejected Bilski’s claims on the grounds that they were not a patentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
