Search for: "US v. Kale" Results 21 - 40 of 45
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2007, 2:51 am
Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Rahul Kale of counsel), for respondent. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm by Joe Whitworth
Authorities traced the kale to four different growers in southern Sweden. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 1:05 pm by Eric
I assume most kale eaters don't overlap with Chik-fil-A consumers. [read post]
4 May 2018, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
For example, in a recent case out of Fairfax County, Artitech, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 9:28 am by Christopher G. Hill
For example, in a recent case out of Fairfax County, Artitech, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 4:10 am by Jim Singer
This happened when a Vermont company’s applied to register the EAT MORE KALE mark for use on apparel and other products. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:11 pm
And more recently, it was Sandra Day O’Connor who reminded us in Hamdan v. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 1:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  (2) uses to inform consumers/the market about aspects of the D’s product—descriptive fair uses, nominative fair use, resale uses. (3) a special subset is use of the mark in technological contexts, such as metatags/AdWords. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 5:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Fair use—maybe it should be unitary. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  (Expression v. traditional advertising may have something to do with the differences here—NFU is problematic perhaps because it spans both types of uses, whereas Rogers is for expression that isn’t standard advertising.) [read post]