Search for: "Uber Technologies, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 449
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2024, 11:34 am by Mark J. Levin
Uber Technologies, Inc., in which a divided panel of the Pennsylvania Superior Court (and later the Superior Court en banc) held that courts must apply a “stricter burden of proof” when asked to enforce an arbitration agreement in a company’s online terms and conditions because arbitration waives the constitutional right to a jury trial.... [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 6:00 am by Michelle
The latest deadline extension comes at the behest of class administrator Epiq Class Action & Claims Solutions Inc. [read post]
Baylson (i) invoked a court’s inherent powers to manage its docket in dismissing with prejudice a long-running collective action lawsuit against Uber Technologies, Inc. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 1:39 pm by Garrett Parks and Claudia Ren
In 2021, drivers for services including Uber Technologies Inc., Lyft Inc. and DoorDash Inc., joined with the Service Employees International Union and its California chapter to challenge Proposition 22. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 12:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
Uber Technologies, Inc.: As plaintiffs' opening brief explains: "Because so many Jane Doe plaintiffs filed actions against Uber, they assumed additional pseudonyms utilizing the initials of the law firms representing them. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:12 am by admin
 See, NLRB Advice Memorandum Dated April 16, 2019, Uber Technologies, Inc. [read post]
Uber Technologies, the California Supreme Court recognized that the proper course for a trial court to take after compelling an employee’s individual PAGA claim to arbitration is to stay the non-individual PAGA claim. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 9:55 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
These cases were recently consolidated into a new class action MDL (In re: Uber Technologies Inc., Passenger Sexual Assault Litigation – MDL No. 3084). [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
How does a Court assess a class action claim against a high-tech giant where the evidence is that the plaintiff reaffirmed the conditions of use numerous times in making her transactions in the world following the Supreme Court of Canada’s seminal case in Uber Technologies Inc. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 10:05 am by Arthur F. Coon
“I fought the law and the law won” – The Crickets In an opinion filed July 19, and later ordered published on August 16, 2023, the Second District Court of Appeal (Div. 6) reversed the trial court’s grant of a preliminary injunction in a CEQA action enjoining the Santa Barbara County Road Commissioner from enforcing public laws by removing unpermitted encroachments from a public right-of-way. [read post]