Search for: "United States v. Andrews" Results 21 - 40 of 2,685
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
The claimant, who formerly worked as a recruitment consultant for the defendant’s agency, sued the defendant for an email she sent to her new employer, stating that she was in breach of her contract by contacting her old clients. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 5:50 am by Berke Gursoy
This is a high but not impossible bar to meet, as shown in United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 7:31 am by Andy Gillin
Last updated: 07/31/2022 People who follow the news in the United States are not strangers to disturbing legal stories that often dominate the headlines. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:41 am by Eric Goldman
Andrews, 534 U.S. 19, 27 (2001) (Ginsburg, J.); and Justices Scalia and Thomas have criticized the expansive use of the discovery rule as a “bad wine of recent vintage,” id. at 37 (Scalia, J., concurring); Rotkiske v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am by INFORRM
United States TikTok and ByteDance have initiated legal action against the US government, challenging a recently enacted law that would ban TikTok unless ByteDance sells the company off in the next nine months to an entity not controlled by a foreign adversary. [read post]
1 May 2024, 11:04 am by Barbara Moreno
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 43. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am by admin
In any event, Egilman was probably not committed to the violent overthrow of the United States government because he had found a better way to destabilize our society by allying himself with the lawsuit industry. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 7:44 am by Just Security
by Joana de Andrade Pacheco (@_JoanaPacheco) United Nations – Srebrenica Genocide Critical UN Move: Draft Resolution Confronts Genocide Denial in the Balkans by Leon Hartwell (@LeonHartwell) and Hikmet Karčić (@hikmet_karcic) Podcast: Presidential Immunity The Just Security Podcast: United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 3:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The law is very clear that an agreement to perform unaudited services does not shield an accountant from liability because an accountant must perform all services in accordance with the standard of a reasonable accountant under similar circumstances, which includes reporting fraud that is or should be apparent (see 1136 Tenants’ Corp. v Rothenberg & Co., 36 AD2d 804 [1st Dept 1971], affd 30 NY2d 585 [1972]; see also William Iselin & Co., Inc. v Mann Judd… [read post]