Search for: "United States v. Barnett" Results 21 - 40 of 478
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2009, 6:17 am
" Id.So what kind of structural change can be used to revive federalism in the United States? [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 4:15 am by James Nurton
The judgment in Case C172/18 AMS Neve Ltd, Barnett Waddingham Trustees, Mark Crabtree v Heritage Audio SL, Pedro Rodríguez Arribas addresses questions concerning jurisdiction, in particular in cases involving Internet sales. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:05 pm
FCC, 736 F.3d 1192 (9th Cir. 2013), petition filed, No. 13-1124 (March 17, 2014), urges the Supreme Court of the United States to overrule Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
United States and by Justice Scalia in Printz v. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 8:02 am by admin
Decision issued September 8, 2020: “Goren v Barnett” — “From 2010 to approximately 2013, the law firm of Amstein & Lehr LLP (Arnstein & Lehr) represented the Regional Center as securities counsel in various matters related to its EB-5 program administered by the United States Citizen and Immigration Services. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 10:00 am by Zachary Spilman
Ballan, No. 11-1394 and United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 8:02 am by Randy Barnett
And consequently, whenever nine, or rather ten States, were united in the desire of a particular amendment, that amendment must infallibly take place.” [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am by Richard Altieri, Margaret Taylor
On June 1, President Trump spoke to governors and the public about deploying the military within the United States. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 1:14 pm by Randy Barnett
(Randy Barnett) Minutes ago, the Solicitor General filed its petition for cert in the Florida v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:56 am by Rick Hasen
Calabresi There’s also this in the student-written portion of the HLR Supreme Court issue: LEADING CASES FIRST AMENDMENT False Statements of Fact: United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 9:27 am
United States, the color-blind principle advocated so long by the conservatives on the Court in numerous affirmative action cases, and the sovereign immunity principle applicable to suits against states by their own citizens that the Court concocted in Hans and reaffirmed in Seminole Tribe. [read post]