Search for: "United States v. Davis" Results 21 - 40 of 3,016
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Scalia, J., thought Presidents were "officers of the United States" (Lawfare). [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm by Amy Howe
Specifically, it concluded, the presidency is not an “office … under the United States,” and the president is not an “officer of the United States. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:46 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The reason, quite simply, is that these transactions did not result in a liquidation, in whole or in part, of the camp business”]; and Dukas v Davis Aircraft Prods. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 8:00 am by Paul Caron
United States: Avoiding a Damaging Limiting Principle in the Sixteenth Amendment, 41 Yale J. on Reg.: Notice & Comment (Jan. 12, 2024): The Supreme Court... [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 12:05 am by Frank Cranmer
(L&RUK Health Warning: Mandy Rice-Davies Applies.) [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 10:44 am by Mavrick Law Firm
  The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, in Davis v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by Noah Brown
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first oral contraceptive available in the United States without a prescription. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Douthat might mean to take on the very idea of the supremacy of the United States Constitution or the institution of judicial review, but if so, he needs to say a lot more. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
Nelson, Harvard Law School Businesses in the United States are increasingly supporting regulation and regulators against judicial decisions curtailing agency authority. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:13 am by Jennifer González
Items written by BG Lieber on military and constitutional law: Constitutional Uses of the Military Forces of the United States, 1898. [read post]