Search for: "United States v. Grant"
Results 21 - 40
of 25,681
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2025, 5:36 am
It provides that “a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” shall be a “national[] and citizen[] of the United States at birth. [read post]
15 May 2025, 4:37 am
The United States is “getting close to a deal” with Iran, and Tehran has “sort of agreed” to its terms, Trump said yesterday. [read post]
15 May 2025, 3:26 am
Today, the United States Supreme Court will hear three consolidated cases in Trump v. [read post]
14 May 2025, 3:17 pm
" It identifies the catalyst for the memo and DOJ's change in policy as to the ABA: "[T]he ABA filed a lawsuit against the United States. [read post]
14 May 2025, 11:03 am
United States, et al. [read post]
14 May 2025, 6:00 am
In the United States, the view that tech platforms are outposts of free speech and democracy has been leveraged to grant the industry sweeping immunity from liability under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. [read post]
14 May 2025, 5:56 am
Last year in Ohio v. [read post]
14 May 2025, 5:01 am
Fraser (1986), the United States Supreme Court found that a student engaged in speech not protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
14 May 2025, 4:00 am
As Mark Kende explained here on the blog on Monday, President Trump's decision to allow entry to the United States of white South Africans as refugees--even as it denies such admission to thousands of Black and brown people facing persecution throughout the world--can only be described as racist. [read post]
13 May 2025, 7:50 am
Indeed, the Labour government has been engaged in a very similar permitting reform debate to the one raging in the United States, but it is more advanced at the government level. [read post]
13 May 2025, 7:03 am
Washington, filed in Seattle by a group of four states; and Trump v. [read post]
13 May 2025, 5:01 am
From Judge James Lorenz's order yesterday in S.E. v. [read post]
12 May 2025, 7:43 am
United States, No. 25-5151; RFE/RL, Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2025, 4:05 am
United States. [read post]
9 May 2025, 6:28 am
The Church alleged the defendants violated the Substantial Burden and Equal Terms Provisions of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) and the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
9 May 2025, 3:49 am
Sussman of the defendant Sussman & Watkins (hereinafter together the Sussman defendants) to represent her in an action she commenced in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging violations of 42 USC § 1983. [read post]
9 May 2025, 1:19 am
United States, 319 U. [read post]
8 May 2025, 5:38 pm
United States (2024) while not calling for a constitutional amendment to change the membership of the Supreme Court). [read post]
8 May 2025, 6:19 am
Here is the abstract: In 1978’s Oliphant v. [read post]
8 May 2025, 6:00 am
DC 37's asserted defense that the "[c]omplaint fails to state a claim against [DC 37] upon which relief may be granted" encompassed DC 37's later argument that plaintiff failed to meet his burdens, including under the Martin rule (see Morton v Mulgrew, 144 AD3d 447, 448 [1st Dept 2016]; Salemeh, 25 AD3d at 411-412).The court also properly dismissed plaintiff's breach of contract claim against his employer, H+H, because his employment… [read post]
