Search for: "United States v. Hughes Properties, Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 110
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2020, 11:08 am
Responding to the invitation from the Supreme Court, the Solicitor General for the United States has filed an amicus brief for the United States in Hikma Pharmaceuticals USC Inc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 10:39 am
| Feilin v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 6:43 am
Permakat Eleonora Rosati wrote about Warner Music and Another v TuneIn Inc, an important High Court of England and Wales "test case" about infringement of copyright in sound recordings under section 20 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 7:02 am
However, starting with United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 9:18 am
Heller in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:01 pm
If opinions from the Lone Star State's highest court such as the one just handed down in Scripps NP Operating LLC v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 3:46 am
Christy, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am
The Equustek decision, Google Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 1:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 4:19 am
City School Dist. of City of Newburgh v Hugh Stubbins & Associates, Inc. (85 NY2d 535 1995) can be distinguished because that plaintiff reviewed and approved specifications and had control during construction, giving it the functional equivalent of privity. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm
” Law nerds shed a tear when the court resolved the sentencing issue in Hughes v. [read post]
26 May 2018, 3:01 am
-- SAS Institute Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 7:01 am
Munsingwear, Inc., the Supreme Court should vacate the U.S. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 1:22 pm
Munsingwear Inc., the Supreme Court should vacate the U.S. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 2:09 pm
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 8:11 am
And Garco Construction, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 12:51 pm
Garco Construction, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 11:43 am
Garco Construction, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 7:06 am
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit has held and the United States has repeatedly urged; and (2) whether a court should apply federal or state law to determine whether assets constitute “property of” or “assets of” the sovereign under the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act and Section 1610(g), and whether those provisions require that the sovereign own the property in question, as the U.S. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 2:29 pm
New Prime, Inc. v. [read post]
