Search for: "United States v. Lord" Results 21 - 40 of 978
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2006, 2:28 am
A brief note on the recent House of Lords decision in the case of Jones v. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 6:29 am by Gilles Cuniberti
As to the specific test in State immunity cases, the Court referred to its judgment of 2001 in the similar case of Al-Adsani v. the United Kingdom (no. 35763/97). [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 3:48 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The minority (Lord Stephens and Lord Briggs) would have dismissed Libya’s appeal on the first issue. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 10:04 pm by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Bruce Lord Wilder Freedom of Speech in the United States from The Federalist to McCutcheon v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 2:36 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In giving the lead majority judgment Lord Mance stated that although the present situation may not have been foreseen by the legislature, it is not a reason for reading into clear legislation a specific exemption which would not reflect the scope of any exemption in EU law. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 12:55 pm by Betty Lupinacci
A few years ago, after a major inventorying project, the Law Library’s collection of United States Court of Appeals Records and Briefs was sentto our state-of-the-art off-site storage at Fort Meade for safekeeping. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 4:33 am by Grace Capel
The post Case Preview: Al-Jedda v Secretary of State for the Home Department appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 5:25 pm by INFORRM
Lord Wilson however referred to S v United Kingdom (2009) 48 EHRR 1169, where the Grand Chamber held that the applicants’ reasonable concern about future use was relevant to whether interference had already arisen. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:34 am by Christopher Brown, Matrix
Lord Sumption, referring to Lord Hoffmann’s speech in Matadeen v Pointu [1999] 1 AC 98 and that of Baroness Hale in Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] 2 AC 557, stated that the principle of equality was “not a principle special to the jurisprudence of the European Union. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 7:34 am by ASAD KHAN
To that extent, Lord Carnwath disagreed with Elias LJ’s analysis in MA (Pakistan) & Ors [2016] EWCA Civ 705 at para 40 where a more mechanical, seemingly automatic, interpretation of s 117B(6) had been proposed entirely in isolation from the whole family unit’s overall circumstances. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:11 am by Charon QC
But it’s the lawyers who are dominant in business in the United States*. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 12:38 am
United States, 464 U.S. 814 (1983). [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:19 pm by John A. Gallagher
Kennedy announced the Court's 5-4 ruling making same-sex marriage lawful in every state in the United States of America. [read post]