Search for: "United States v. Park" Results 21 - 40 of 3,042
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2015, 11:05 am by Robert Brammer
United States vaccination requirements have been in the news, particularly following what the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has described as “a large, ongoing multi-state outbreak linked to an amusement park in California. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 12:36 pm by admin
Jewell, the court granted the United States Park Service, summary judgment because police officer Wayne Bridgeforth’s claims of retaliation were too speculative for trial. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 8:32 pm by Kate Howard
Park; and (2) whether Park and its precursor, United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 3:23 pm by Dwight Sullivan
The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Air Force for remand to that court for consideration of the granted issue in light of United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 4:13 pm by James Hamilton
Gayle, 142 F.Supp 707, a ruling later upheld by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 11:47 am
Park is a citizen of Korea, marries another citizen of Korea, and they come to the United States. [read post]
2 May 2014, 1:23 pm by Environmental Law Prof
United States, which will hopefully be the court's last word in the fight over access to Salt Creek Canyon in Canyonlands National Park. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 1:27 pm by Sean Toomey
Earlier this year there was hope in the food and drug industries that the Supreme Court would revisit and possibly revise the Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine, also known as the Park Doctrine, by granting certiorari to the Eighth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 1:27 pm by Sean Toomey
Earlier this year there was hope in the food and drug industries that the Supreme Court would revisit and possibly revise the Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine, also known as the Park Doctrine, by granting certiorari to the Eighth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 1:23 pm by The Federalist Society
Sturgeon and Alaska contended that the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA) precludes NPS from regulating activities on state-owned lands and navigable waters that fall within the boundaries of National Park System units in Alaska. [read post]