Search for: "United States v. Patten" Results 21 - 40 of 47
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2015, 2:46 am
On Friday, Floyd LJ gave the leading judgment (with which Patten and Tomlinson LJJ agreed) in JW Spear & Sons Ltd & Others v Zynga Inc [2015] EWCA Civ 290. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 6:12 am by Susan Brenner
Litzinger then called the First Assistant United States Attorney for North Dakota, who said that the VHS tapes were within the scope of the warrant. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:25 am
Petrodell v Prest appeal to be heard by the Supreme CourtThe Court of Appeal, comprising Lord Justices Thorpe, Rimer and Patten, have given permission to Yasmin Prest to appeal to the Supreme Court against its decision in Petrodell Resources Limited v Prest [2012] EWCA Civ 1395. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
[Update] On 27 January 2012 HHJ Parkes QC gave judgment in the case of Patel v United ([2012] EWHC 92 (QB)), heard on 20 January 2012. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by INFORRM
  On the same date HHJ Parkes QC heard a “Norwich Pharmacal” application in the case of Patel v Unite. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 7:15 pm by Andrew Koppelman
United States: Elliott Welsh’s Two Religious TestsAndrew KoppelmanChapter 11Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 3:48 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) On September 30, Judge Doherty of the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana handed down a decision in Vidrine v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
On the issue of justiciability of the claim based on infringement of United States copyright, the Court had this to say: "87. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 12:02 am
Adopting the maxim that things are more fun in pairs, the Court of Appeal yesterday handed down not one, but two judgments in the Virgin Atlantic aircraft seating cases: Virgin Atlantic Airways v Delta Air Lines [2011] EWCA Civ 162; and Virgin Atlantic Airways v Premium Aircraft Interiors [2011] EWCA Civ 163. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 5:06 am by (Peter Black)
United States: The state secrets privilege at the Supreme Court" very intriguing ... [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
In the United States such rights are an aspect of the tort of privacy – the so-called “right to publicity” (for a recent case on these see here). [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 5:01 am
Having secured a favourable judgment, the claimants sued in the United Kingdom alleging, inter alia, that Ainsworth had infringed UK copyright laws. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Van Patten, No. 07-212 Grant of habeas relief from a conviction and sentence for first-degree reckless homicide is reversed where, contrary to the ruling below, no clearly established law contrary to the state court's conclusion justified collateral relief with regard to a claim that petitioner received ineffective assistance of counsel due to his participation in a plea hearing by speaker phone. . [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 2:12 pm
And so… for a short time… we move away from the blawgs of the United States of America…. [read post]