Search for: "United States v. American Federation of Musicians" Results 21 - 40 of 61
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2010, 3:43 am by Russ Bensing
Since immigrating to the United States in 1991, Plaintiff has sued over twenty business entities for alleged accessibility violations, and, in all (but one) of those cases, he never returned to the establishment he sued after settling the case and obtaining a cash payment. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
How could musicians earn a living if the public were free to listen to music in our homes? [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:59 am by Chris Wesner
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION AT COLUMBUS In re: NASHEL : : : : : Jose J. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 4:24 am by centerforartlaw
Otherwise, we have not yet had a truly uniform statute of limitations throughout the United States. [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 5:26 am
: Microsoft v i4i (IPKat) (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O) (Washington State Patent Law Blog)   US Copyright When pirates become copyright cash cows (TorrentFreak) Can copyright save the newspaper industry? [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm
Justice Ginsburg went right at it by saying to Solicitor General of the United States Donald Verrilli... [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 8:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Look internationally.Ken Hatfield Artist Rights Caucus of Local 802 of the American Federation of Musicians: Unfair loophole that allows profit from mass infringement. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
  A New York federal judge agreed to certify an interlocutory appeal by SiriusXM against the ruling that gave state copyright law protection to pre-1972 sound recordings. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46)   Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 1:47 pm by Howard Knopf
Even the recently retired Chairman stated almost 10 years ago that the delay in decision rendering was excessive. [read post]
30 May 2014, 4:40 am by Ben
 Conyers stated the bill would give "a fair shake" to legendary artists and their lesser-known backing musicians. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]