Search for: "United States v. Corcoran"
Results 21 - 40
of 132
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2007, 6:16 pm
On July 18, 2007, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia rejected the United States Government's interpretation of the Treaty of Amity between the United States and Iran, and affirmed an earlier decision allowing American plaintiffs to sue Iran in U.S. courts under Article IV(2) of the Treaty: McKesson Corp. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2006, 8:18 am
In the context of an action for the recognition of an English money judgment in the District of Columbia, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit confirmed the preclusive effect of the Act of State doctrine. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 6:02 pm
Based on a statement of interest filed by the State Department with the court, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed the matter of La Reunion Aerienne v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 6:16 pm
City of New York, docket number 06-134, the court applied the FSIA exception of 27 USC §1605(a)(4) to rights in immovable property situated in the United States. -- Clemens Kochinke, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP, Washington. [read post]
15 Sep 2012, 11:57 am
Republic of Peru, docket number 11-1602, before the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:44 pm
Earlier today the Digital Media Law Project, through our counsel at the Harvard Law School Cyberlaw Clinic, joined a brief filed by the Electronic Frontier Foundation in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts case Tuteur v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:10 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in New York City followed the Supreme Court and, on June 28, 2010, affirmed in part, vacated in part and remanded the lower court's decision in Carpenter v. [read post]
19 Nov 2006, 1:11 pm
ENC Corporation et al., docket number 04-16401, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit resolved the indispensable party issue with respect to the Republic of the Philippines, Arelma, Roxas and Golden Buddha in favor of human rights victims, confirming the Hawaiian district court decision on September 12, 2006. -- Clemens Kochinke, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP, Washington. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 12:00 pm
Only peripherally mentioned, as an interest party, is a foreign state in the arbitration and anti-suit injunction decision rendered by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on September 7, 2007 in the matter Karaha Bodas Co., LLC v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 6:27 pm
The facts in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit's unpublished decision in the matter Hilsenrath v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 6:27 pm
The facts in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit's unpublished decision in the matter Hilsenrath v. [read post]
25 Nov 2006, 4:11 pm
By contrast, use of its police forces for such a purpose would have enabled Peru to retain immunity from suit in the United States. -- Clemens Kochinke, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP, Washington. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 6:21 pm
The Kingdom sought review of the same issue in the recognition proceeding in the United States and lost when the United States District Court applied a deferential review. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 7:15 pm
Anne-Marie Kagy, docket number 05-7077, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia decides against that claim. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 12:00 pm
Peterson et al. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 5:58 pm
The decision was not a close call, the court confirmed, because the Ministry had purchased American goods and acted commercially with direct effects in the United States. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 5:50 pm
The State Department's practice of offering courts a "Suggestion of Immunity" to express its views came under review by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in the matter Habyarimana v. [read post]
25 Dec 2007, 6:00 am
Of possible tangential value to embassies and consulates is the United States District Court for the District of Columbia decision of September 19, 2007 in the matter Menachem Binyamin Zivitofsky et al. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 1:57 pm
An exchange of notes that addresses many points of a future agreement between nations but is silent on certain aspects of the agreement cannot remove the unspoken matter from the realm of justiciable issues under the act of state and related doctrines, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held in Eli Gross et al. v. [read post]
27 May 2007, 7:48 pm
V(1)(e) of the Convention. -- Clemens Kochinke, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP, Washington. [read post]
