Search for: "United States v. Napolitano"
Results 21 - 40
of 93
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2023, 4:28 am
Once United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) determines that two regulatory criteria have been met, it conducts a second layer of review – the “final merits determination” pursuant to Kazarian v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm
United States v Yancey, 621 F3d 681 (7th Cir 2010) (per curiam) (rejecting Second Amendment challenge to 18 USC § 922(g)(3), which makes it a criminal felony for one who is an unlawful user of, or addicted to, any controlled substance to possess a gun); United States v Seay, 620 F3d 919 (8th Cir 2010), pet. for cert. filed, Dec. 16, 2010 (same) (see also 620 F3d at 924-25, collecting cases); United States v Skoien,… [read post]
5 May 2009, 1:48 pm
United States significantly limited a tactic used by U.S. [read post]
3 May 2013, 3:29 pm
"In rejecting Smallwood’s Fourth Amendment challenge, the district court relied upon United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 7:23 am
” Thus, as the Solicitor General explainedto the Supreme Court in the recent United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 6:42 am
Times by Jeffrey Kayes discusses the possibility that Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano may weigh in on the Arizona statute at issue in United States Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 2:47 pm
Citizenship and Immigration Service has provided additional guidance on the implementation of the Supreme Court’s United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 1:35 pm
After the United States Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 1:35 pm
After the United States Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 2:30 pm
" United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
Francis failed to depart the United States as required by the visa. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 5:57 am
United States, released earlier this month. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 5:00 pm
In a departure from the voluntary E-Verify, employers that are a party to a contract (or subcontract) containing this E-Verify clause will be required to use E-Verify to confirm the employment eligibility of all new hires and all employees who perform work directly under the contract.Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 7:07 am
” The case is United Student Aid Fund v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:51 am
At the Conglomerate, Tamara Piety discusses the likely impact of Citizens United on a series of civil RICO cases filed by the United States against tobacco companies; petitions for certiorari in the case are currently before the Court. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 7:10 am
In light of the five-year anniversary of the Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 7:18 am
For once, it's okay to blame the lawyers: the parties in a lawsuit over the legality of E-Verify, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 12:30 pm
Gordon v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 10:49 am
(You can read the Court's decision in Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 8:45 am
All of his immediate family members are United States citizens or lawful permanent residents. [read post]
