Search for: "United States v. Peterson"
Results 21 - 40
of 272
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2019, 6:48 am
Office of Benton Peterson (D.D.C.) -- dismissing plaintiff’s lawsuit because he sent FOIA request to an Assistant United States Attorney instead of to the FOIA office that maintains the records or to DOJ’s mail referral unit, as required by DOJ regulations.Leopold v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 2:02 pm
Our second largest state seceded from Mexico (and then, of course, with ten other states, attempted to secede from the United States in a struggle that ultimately cost 750,000 lives (for starters). [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:57 am
Bank Markazi challenged ITRSHRA in Bank Markazi v. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 4:32 am
Under United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 12:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 12:42 pm
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DAVID H. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 8:00 am
Estate of Marion Peterson v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 5:39 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 9:48 pm
State v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 11:31 pm
’s position on the global stage than other candidates. [46] V. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 4:48 am
State v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 4:23 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 9:02 am
On Friday, August 11, 2023, United States District Judge David Nuffer of the United States District Court of the District of Utah granted motions to dismiss the cases challenging the Bears Ears National Monument designation. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 8:04 am
United States, No. 14-8913. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
The Third Circuit, however, has since stated, in Landsman & Funk P.C. v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 10:18 pm
Peterson and Leibundguth seek a declaratory judgment that the ordinance violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 4 of the Illinois Constitution, and a permanent injunction against enforcing the ordinance. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 11:45 am
Peterson (2015 WI 85) by our state’s highest court on July 16, 2015. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 8:33 pm
But the Sixth Circuit disagreed, relying on the two components of the "mandate rule" from United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 9:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 7:56 am
United States. [read post]
