Search for: "United States v. Swan" Results 21 - 40 of 116
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Case date: 20 April 2022 Case number: No. 18-916 Court: Supreme Court of the United States A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:37 pm by Brian D. Moore
Fox Searchlight Pictures Inc., 11 Civ 6784 (WHP) United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
Case date: 17 October 2022 Case number: No. 21-2350 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 9:58 pm by David Cheifetz
It’s small, in light of his other issues, but Donald Trump is once again embroiled in litigation, albeit outside of the United States, which may result in findings against him of at least negligent misrepresentation sufficient to produce personal liability: see Singh v Trump et al, 2016 ONCA 747 (CanLII), <http://canlii.ca/t/gv3z7>. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 6:30 am by Ted Tjaden
Of the citing cases, CanLII had United Gulf Developments Limited v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
In the United States, the courts have been highly reluctant to award emotional damages for death or injury of a pet. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 6:41 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
United States, 713 F.2d 728, 730 (Fed. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 4:41 pm by Reference Staff
Also includes articles on Native American law in the Supreme CourtBoldt Decision — United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 12:24 pm
The territorial limitation contained in the policy provided coverage for incidents occurring in Canada, the United States of America, and any other jurisdiction designated in the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule. [read post]
Recently, the decisions of courts in the United Kingdom (UK) in Unwired Planet v Huawei Technologies (Unwired Planet) and Optis Cellular Technology v Apple (which followed the decision of the UK Supreme Court in Unwired Planet) have given rise to significant debate over the appropriate forum for litigation of disputes in relation to standard essential patents (SEPs). [read post]