Search for: "United States v. Whitfield"
Results 21 - 40
of 63
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2015, 4:46 am
In Whitfield v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 12:03 pm
United States, in which the Justices have expressed similar unease with the potential scope of prosecutorial discretion, is not clear. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 4:08 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 3:53 am
" United States v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 4:40 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 1:35 pm
The discussion draft overturns the landmark Supreme Court case Massachusetts v. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 12:01 am
See United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:57 am
” Yesterday the Court heard oral arguments in Whitfield v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 7:14 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 3:36 am
Whitfield, __ F.3d __ (5th Cir. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:43 am
United States and Yates v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 4:35 am
United States and last Term’s Bond v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 7:21 pm
Whitfield's case, United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:43 am
Expectation of privacy underlies decisions in such cases as United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 1:04 pm
It is well documented that, under existing standards and regulations, air quality in the United States has improved considerably and will continue to do so," the members wrote. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 9:51 am
(“Newegg”) in TQP’s suit for infringement of United States Patent No. 5,412,730 (the “’730 Patent”). [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 8:57 am
Grocery Manufacturers Association, et al v. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 11:37 am
In Leary v United States, 395 US 6, 33 [1969], the Supreme Court held that “a criminal statutory presumption must be regarded as ‘irrational’ or ‘arbitrary,’ and hence unconstitutional, unless it can at least be said with substantial assurance that the presumed fact is more likely than not to flow from the proved fact on which it is made to depend. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 11:37 am
In Leary v United States, 395 US 6, 33 [1969], the Supreme Court held that “a criminal statutory presumption must be regarded as ‘irrational’ or ‘arbitrary,’ and hence unconstitutional, unless it can at least be said with substantial assurance that the presumed fact is more likely than not to flow from the proved fact on which it is made to depend. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 8:52 am
United States Army Corps of Engineers - 3/23/15. [read post]
