Search for: "William Baude"
Results 21 - 40
of 417
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
This post and the next are follow-ups to my collection of posts on Trump v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 9:20 am
He didn't mention any executive branch authority, including opinions from William Rehnquist and Antonin Scalia. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm
Two scholars who are not here are William Baude of the University of Chicago law school and Michael Stokes Paulsen of the University of St. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
[A reply to Prof. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:17 am
, with William Baude (Ep. 129) [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 7:31 am
Professors William Baude and Michael Paulsen recently announced their article, The Sweep and Force of Section Three, arguing that Section Three... [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
[A new source in the debate over Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment.] [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
William Baude, Is Originalism Our Law? [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:09 am
, The Guardian (Dec. 29, 2023) Judge Luttig: Trump eligibility case ‘tests America’s commitment to its own democracy’, MSNBC (Dec. 23, 2023) Adam Liptak, An About-Face on Whether the 14th Amendment Bars Trump From Office, New York Times (Sept. 18, 2023) Noah Feldman, Alas, Trump Is Still Eligible to Run for Office, Bloomberg (Aug. 20, 2023) Baude, William and Paulsen, Michael Stokes, The Sweep and Force of Section Three (August 9, 2023). [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 10:40 am
Efforts to rely on Section 3 to keep Trump off the ballot in 2024 gained momentum after the release in August of an upcoming article in the University of Pennsylvania Law Review by two conservative law professors, William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:02 pm
Meanwhile, as Professors William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen have documented in a widely cited forthcoming article in the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, there are other oddities of Griffin’s Case that make it a particularly poor authority on the meaning of Section 3.Trump’s team will lodge other objections. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 1:18 pm
Will Baude (#26). [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:54 am
William Baude Comments on Oral Arguments in SEC v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 6:30 am
William Baude, University of Chicago Law School, Jud Campbell, Stanford Law School, and Stephen E. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 1:57 pm
Professor William Baude taught Constitutional Law … … while Professor Saul Levmore taught a Contracts class. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
Baude and Paulsen spend a majority of their 126-page law review article explaining why Section 3 must be self-executing. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
”William Baude, who teaches law at the University of Chicago, disagrees with Hollis-Brusky’s assessment. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 3:44 pm
In August, two prominent legal scholars who are members of the conservative judicial group the Federalist Society, William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen, suggested that Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment clearly bars Trump from running for reelection. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 11:08 pm
A draft law review article taking issue with Baude and Paulsen, co-written by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tilman, entitled Sweeping and Forcing the President into Section 3: A Response to William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen makes a good case that what happened on January 6, 2021 was not an "insurrection" and that the Baude/Paulsen reading of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment is wrong. [read post]
