Search for: "Wood v. Ups*" Results 21 - 40 of 109
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2014, 10:05 pm by Kevin
Supreme Court, and the Court vacated the judgment against him and remanded after its Second Amendment ruling in McDonald v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 8:00 pm
v=UODUzow514MVideo Credit: Sean Evans, @evvo1991backtothemovies.com/ [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 3:35 pm by INFORRM
In Wood v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis, the Court of Appeal accepted that the retention, by the police, of photographs of an activist constituted an actionable breach of the Article 8 right to privacy given the sinister overtures of state monitoring that this retention spoke to. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:52 am by Marty Lederman
Most of my previous posts here about Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood have been devoted to the question of whether the plaintiffs have adequately alleged that federal law imposes a "substantial burden" on their exercise of religion--the threshold question under RFRA. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 3:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
In this case, certain gags had been copied from Knock on Wood. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:30 am by Matthew Flinn
In this case, Mr Malcolm pointed out that Article 8 is a very broad right (a point which has often been made in posts on this blog), and that it encompasses expansive and rather amorphous concepts such as a person’s “physical and psychological integrity” (Pretty v United Kingdom (2002) 35 EHRR 1 at [66]) and “personal autonomy“ (R (Wood) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2010] 1 WLR 123 at [21]-[22]). [read post]