Search for: "Wu v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 134
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2018, 8:15 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In 1996, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California ruled in Daniel J. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 9:21 pm
Private parties have been instrumental in proposing or funding a large number of the United States’ most iconic monuments, such as the Vietnam Veterans’ Memorial. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:07 am by Susan Brenner
On October 17, at Hoffman's request, Wu traveled from China to the United States. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 7:11 am
[Celebrity Baby Blog] Sponsored Topics: Law - United States - National Law Journal - Products - Services [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Susan Illston, Judge, United States District Court, Northern District of California Aton Arbisser, Kaye Scholer LLP Elizabeth J. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Tim Wu argues that Monday’s decision in Ohio v. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 9:30 pm by Emily Prifogle
” The result is a sweeping rereading of American history that emphasizes the need to understand immigration and the United States in global perspectives. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 5:30 am by Kori Shafer-Stack
  Following appeal of the case by both parties, the Ninth Circuit United States Court of Appeals upheld the constitutionality of the lien activation fees on June 29, 2015. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 2:16 pm
And in United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 4:10 am by Becky (Hyun Jeong) Baek
” As for tax estoppel, the Court distinguished United Hay v Harounian, which rejected tax estoppel where an amendment to the tax returns materially impacted the parties’ positions. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by Angela Swan
The authors are principally British and Canadian with two from the United States (one of whom used to teach at a Canadian law school), two from Singapore, two from Australia and one from Israel. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
* The IPKat weblog and the European Patent Office: some points of clarificationMerpel and you need to talk.* Offering a service is not use in commerce Under Lanham Act, says Federal Circuit Court Blogger and recent guest Kat Marie-Andrée Weiss explains the ruling in David Couture v Playdom, a Federal Circuit's decision that highlights a difference of approach between the trade mark law of the United States and that of the European Union as regards the… [read post]
  United States District Courts in California oversee some of the largest caseloads in the country.[1] Understandably reluctant to see their dockets expand, these courts often look for grounds to remand cases to state court. [read post]