Search for: "Young v. Lambert"
Results 21 - 39
of 39
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2014, 12:00 am
We have some important news to share from the Digital Media Law Project. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 5:02 pm
Mr Lambert was widely quoted at the time as saying that the borough’s 41 privately-operated care homes were failing to protect the young people they are looking after. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 9:00 am
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit issued its ruling in Young v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
Warner-Lambert Co. [read post]
21 May 2012, 3:08 am
Oh, and he still owes us for the whole Bush v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:15 am
Perhaps it was decided that young Lance needed some mentoring, and who better than Leon to make sure his career went swimmingly? [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 3:31 pm
• Jakub Jost, 'Joined Cases C-92/09 AND c-93/09 Volker und Markus Schecke GbR Hartmut Eifert v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 3:15 pm
• Jakub Jost, 'Joined Cases C-92/09 AND c-93/09 Volker und Markus Schecke GbR Hartmut Eifert v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:25 pm
Distribution v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 10:55 pm
After pleading guilty to that offence, he was sentenced to a term of 18 months imprisonment in a Young Offenders Institution and the suspended sentence of 10 weeks was activated. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 3:07 am
An early example of the Great British double entendre Zoe Renault v Renault Zoe. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 4:00 am
DeCoste, Caesar's Faith: Limited Government and Freedom of Religion in Bruker v. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 4:00 am
Young, 153 F.3d 1079, 1080 (9th Cir. 1998); United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 1:02 pm
(for the Court) stated at ¶ 17: Having regard to the terminology adopted by Madam Justice McLachlin in Young v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 5:36 pm
YOUNG V. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 3:02 pm
It gives the classic 'sex party application' ('ex parte application'), and one for matrimonial lawyers that I've not come across before (but am not surprised about): 'Stella contribution' which should, of course, be 'stellar contribution' (see, for example, Lambert v Lambert).All of this reminds me of my favourite typing error from my own experience. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 8:39 am
Then there was the oral argument in Warner Lambert v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 1:11 am
The justices have already agreed to hear a similar case, Riegel v. [read post]
