Search for: "Young v. State, Department of Human Services" Results 21 - 40 of 341
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2007, 10:31 pm
A good example is Sayers and others v Smithkline Beecham plc and others, an England and Wales Queen's Bench Division last Wednesday from Mr Justice Keith, picked up by LexisNexis Butterworths' All England digests.The United States Department of Health and Human Services was involved in US proceedings in which it was alleged that the MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) and MR (measles, rubella) vaccinations in young children helped cause… [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:25 pm by NL
The 1999 guidance then in force, given under s.7 Local Authority Social Services Act 1970, stated: A number of the children and young people who fall within the remit of YOTs will also be children in need, including some whose needs will include safeguarding. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:25 pm by NL
The 1999 guidance then in force, given under s.7 Local Authority Social Services Act 1970, stated: A number of the children and young people who fall within the remit of YOTs will also be children in need, including some whose needs will include safeguarding. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 6:22 am by Joel R. Brandes
Department of Health and Human Services, and Baptist Child and Family Services (BCFS), the children had been placed in a BCFS foster home. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 12:59 pm by Melinda Deel
Currently, MCL 722.638 requires the Department of Human Services (DHS) to petition the family court to terminate parental rights to a child if there is a basis to terminate parental rights under MCL 712A.19b(3)(m). [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 9:04 pm by Stephen Bilkis
And so, even without compensation, when defendants undertook to control a young child and provide care for her, they became responsible for her injury through their negligence. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 6:00 am by Ana Popovich
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and the two whistleblowers allege that unaccompanied, undocumented immigrant children were put in danger at the facility. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 11:10 am
”While a dissent by Justice Marshall Rothstein raises the spectre of an adversarial model where police services can be withheld from the public, Young points to the determination of the majority that states there’s nothing inherently adversarial about an independent collective bargaining model. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 6:35 am
During a subsequent interview, E.L. stated that Nash persuaded her to take the pictures of herself but Nash denies that persuaded E.L. to take the pictures.U.S. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Pakistan International Airline Corporation v Times Travel (UK) Ltd, heard 2-3 November 2020 Triple Point Technology Inc v PTT Public Company Ltd, heard 12 November 2020 R (on the application of TN… [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 1:26 am by Melina Padron
AM v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2486 (Admin) (03 October 2011) October 3, 2011 Mr Justice Silber in High Court: Refusal to amend 5 aspects of control order was lawful. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:20 pm by Bill Marler
Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2016. https://www.cdc.gov/hepatitis/outbreaks/2016/hav-strawberries.htm 170. [read post]