Search for: "Apple v. Apple" Results 381 - 400 of 6,982
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2013, 1:40 am by Florian Mueller
Last week Judge Koh (United States District Court for the Northern District of California) denied a couple of Samsung motions that would, if granted, have delayed the limited Apple v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 12:41 pm by Florian Mueller
This is a very significant setback for Apple, which less than six months ago had already failed, despite a partly-successful appeal, to obtain a sales ban against Samsung in the first California litigation between the two companies, an outcome that Apple accepted as final about a month ago when it withdrew its related cross-appeal.The denial of an injunction following the recent trial in the second California case is based on Apple's failure to satisfy the eBay… [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 4:24 pm by Florian Mueller
And Apple is now virtually certain to get an extra $1 billion that Qualcomm withheld, though it may take another formal step, as I'll discuss further below.Here's the order, followed by further analysis and commentary:19-03-14 Apple v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 11:32 am
  One that's joined by, among others, the Chief Justice, Cantil-Sakauye.They agree with Apple. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 11:51 am by Alex Craigie
Bloomberg TV interviewed Vel Hogan, the foreperson of the jury in the recent Apple v. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 4:35 am
In this patent infringement action, the plaintiff asserted claims from two different patents against Apple. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 5:30 am by Florian Mueller
I now tend to come down on the skeptical side, and that's to some extent also (though not only) because this second California Apple v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 10:33 am by Florian Mueller
In a filing made yesterday, which entered the public record today, Apple summarizes (in unusual detail) Judge Whyte's Realtek v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 12:35 am by Florian Mueller
But a tipping point may have been reached at which conservation will come to an end even in her district court.A few days ago the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied Samsung's motion to stay issuance of a mandate (pending a Supreme Court petition) following a recent appellate ruling on the first California Apple v. [read post]