Search for: "C. v. C."
Results 381 - 400
of 56,457
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2009, 4:58 am
STATUTORY CONSTRUCTIONUnited States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:17 am
For the latter, Viceroy v Syrowatka will be used as an illustrative example. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:17 am
For the latter, Viceroy v Syrowatka will be used as an illustrative example. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 7:03 am
A few days ago, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) decided C More Entertainment AB v Linus Sandberg. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 9:33 am
Criminal procedure — Voir dire — Kazadi v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 8:40 am
Visita nuestro Observatorio COVID-19 en Puerto Rico Se acerca la hora cero para que la gobernadora Wanda Vázquez Garced firme o vete el Proyecto de la Cámara 1654, mejor conocido como el proyecto del nuevo Código Civil. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 2:47 am
Football Association Premier League Ltd and others v QC Leisure and others; Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (Joined Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08); [2011] WLR (D) 286 “The clauses of an exclusive licence agreement concluded between a holder of intellectual property rights and a broadcaster constituted a restriction on competition prohibited by article 101FEU of the FEU Treaty where they obliged the broadcaster not to supply decoding devices enabling… [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 1:11 pm
" § 2291(c)(1). [read post]
11 May 2020, 7:00 am
Supreme Court oral arguments in McGirt v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 7:00 am
Mazars and Trump v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 5:06 pm
La gobernadora Wanda Vázquez Garced firmó esta versión del Proyecto de la Cámara 1654, que ahora será la Ley 55 de 2020, mejor conocida como el Nuevo Código Civil. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 1:48 am
Gebr Weber GmbH v Wittmer Putz v Medianess Electronics GmbH Joined cases C-65/09 and C-87/09; [2011] WLR (D) 210 “Where consumer goods, installed in good faith by the consumer, were not in conformity with the contract under which the consumer had purchased and and were restored to conformity by way of replacement, the seller was obliged pursuant to article 3(2)(3) of Parliament and Council Directive 1999/44/EC either to remove the goods from where they had… [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:54 am
Migrationsverket v Kastrati and Others (Case C-620/10); [2012] WLR (D) 139 “The withdrawal of an asylum application which occurred before the requested member state had agreed to take charge of the asylum seeker, had the effect that Council Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 which established the criteria and mechanisms for determining the member state responsible for examining an asylum application would no longer be applicable. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 9:22 am
G v de Visser (Case C-292/10); [2012] WLR (D) 87 “Where it was impossible to locate the whereabouts of a defendant, European Union law did not preclude the issue of judgment by default in circumstances where the document instituting proceedings had been served by public notice under national law, provided that the court seised of the matter had first satisfied itself that all investigations required by the principles of diligence and good faith had been undertaken to trace… [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 3:27 am
: Why Federal Rule of Evidence 404(A)(2)(C) Should Be Repealed, on SSRN. [read post]
30 May 2023, 12:04 pm
See Google Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 1:44 am
Don C. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 7:35 am
Davis v. [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 3:48 pm
But in its judgment in Case C-173/05 Commission v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 3:08 am
Co. v. [read post]
